Affiliation:
1. Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii , 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
2. Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC) , Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
3. Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) , E-08034 Barcelona, Spain
4. Space Telescope Science Institute , 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
5. Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
6. Department of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The most stringent local measurement of the Hubble–Lemaître constant from Cepheid-calibrated Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) differs from the value inferred via the cosmic microwave background radiation (Planck+ΛCDM) by ∼5σ. This so-called Hubble tension has been confirmed by other independent methods, and thus does not appear to be a possible consequence of systematic errors. Here, we continue upon our prior work of using Type II supernovae to provide another, largely independent method to measure the Hubble–Lemaître constant. From 13 SNe II with geometric, Cepheid, or tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) host-galaxy distance measurements, we derive H$_0= 75.4^{+3.8}_{-3.7}$ km s−1 Mpc−1 (statistical errors only), consistent with the local measurement but in disagreement by ∼2.0σ with the Planck+ΛCDM value. Using only Cepheids (N = 7), we find H$_0 = 77.6^{+5.2}_{-4.8}$ km s−1 Mpc−1, while using only TRGB (N = 5), we derive H$_0 = 73.1^{+5.7}_{-5.3}$ km s−1 Mpc−1. Via 13 variants of our data set, we derive a systematic uncertainty estimate of 1.5 km s−1 Mpc−1. The median value derived from these variants differs by just 0.3 km s−1 Mpc−1 from that produced by our fiducial model. Because we only replace SNe Ia with SNe II – and we do not find statistically significant difference between the Cepheid and TRGB H0 measurements – our work reveals no indication that SNe Ia or Cepheids could be the sources of the ‘H0 tension.’ We caution, however, that our conclusions rest upon a modest calibrator sample; as this sample grows in the future, our results should be verified.
Funder
NSF
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
European Social Fund
CSIC
Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science
AVF
BJS
University of California
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
HSC
Princeton University
University of Tokyo
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
FIRST
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Japan Science and Technology Agency
KEK
University of Hawaii
Johns Hopkins University
Durham University
University of Edinburgh
Queen's University Belfast
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
National Central University
Space Telescope Science Institute
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
University of Maryland
Eotvos Lorand University
California Institute of Technology
W. M. Keck Foundation
Science and Technology Facilities Council
National Research Council Canada
CONICYT
Australian Research Council
CNPq
CONICET
NED
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
U.S. Department of Energy
Higher Education Funding Council for England
National Center for Supercomputing Applications
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Chicago
Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State University
Texas A and M University
Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
MINECO
European Research Council
Office of Science
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics