A 5 per cent measurement of the Hubble–Lemaître constant from Type II supernovae

Author:

de Jaeger T1ORCID,Galbany L23ORCID,Riess A G45,Stahl B E6ORCID,Shappee B J1,Filippenko A V6,Zheng W6

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii , 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

2. Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC) , Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain

3. Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC) , E-08034 Barcelona, Spain

4. Space Telescope Science Institute , 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

5. Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

6. Department of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT The most stringent local measurement of the Hubble–Lemaître constant from Cepheid-calibrated Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) differs from the value inferred via the cosmic microwave background radiation (Planck+ΛCDM) by ∼5σ. This so-called Hubble tension has been confirmed by other independent methods, and thus does not appear to be a possible consequence of systematic errors. Here, we continue upon our prior work of using Type II supernovae to provide another, largely independent method to measure the Hubble–Lemaître constant. From 13 SNe II with geometric, Cepheid, or tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) host-galaxy distance measurements, we derive H$_0= 75.4^{+3.8}_{-3.7}$ km s−1 Mpc−1 (statistical errors only), consistent with the local measurement but in disagreement by ∼2.0σ with the Planck+ΛCDM value. Using only Cepheids (N = 7), we find H$_0 = 77.6^{+5.2}_{-4.8}$ km s−1 Mpc−1, while using only TRGB (N = 5), we derive H$_0 = 73.1^{+5.7}_{-5.3}$ km s−1 Mpc−1. Via 13 variants of our data set, we derive a systematic uncertainty estimate of 1.5 km s−1 Mpc−1. The median value derived from these variants differs by just 0.3 km s−1 Mpc−1 from that produced by our fiducial model. Because we only replace SNe Ia with SNe II – and we do not find statistically significant difference between the Cepheid and TRGB H0 measurements – our work reveals no indication that SNe Ia or Cepheids could be the sources of the ‘H0 tension.’ We caution, however, that our conclusions rest upon a modest calibrator sample; as this sample grows in the future, our results should be verified.

Funder

NSF

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Agencia Estatal de Investigación

European Social Fund

CSIC

Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science

AVF

BJS

University of California

National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

HSC

Princeton University

University of Tokyo

High Energy Accelerator Research Organization

FIRST

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Japan Science and Technology Agency

KEK

University of Hawaii

Johns Hopkins University

Durham University

University of Edinburgh

Queen's University Belfast

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

National Central University

Space Telescope Science Institute

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

University of Maryland

Eotvos Lorand University

California Institute of Technology

W. M. Keck Foundation

Science and Technology Facilities Council

National Research Council Canada

CONICYT

Australian Research Council

CNPq

CONICET

NED

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

U.S. Department of Energy

Higher Education Funding Council for England

National Center for Supercomputing Applications

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

University of Chicago

Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State University

Texas A and M University

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

MINECO

European Research Council

Office of Science

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Tale of Many H0;Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics;2024-09-13

2. Exploring the Hubble tension with a late time Modified Gravity scenario;Physics of the Dark Universe;2024-09

3. ΛCDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks;Universe;2024-07-23

4. Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data;Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics;2024-04-01

5. A Critical Discussion on the H0 Tension;Universe;2024-03-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3