Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study

Author:

Tilz Roland Richard12ORCID,Feher Marcel1,Vogler Julia1ORCID,Bode Kerstin3ORCID,Duta Alexandru Ionut1ORCID,Ortolan Angela1ORCID,Lopez Lisbeth Delgado1,Küchler Mirco1ORCID,Mamaev Roman1,Lyan Evgeny4ORCID,Sommer Philipp5ORCID,Braun Martin5ORCID,Sciacca Vanessa5ORCID,Demming Thomas4,Maslova Vera4ORCID,Kuck Karl-Heinz1ORCID,Heeger Christian-Hendrik12ORCID,Eitel Charlotte1ORCID,Popescu Sorin Stefan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein , Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck , Germany

2. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck , Luebeck , Germany

3. Department of Rhythmology, Heart Center of Leipzig , Leipzig , Germany

4. Department of Internal Medicine III, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein—Campus Kiel , Kiel , Germany

5. Department of Electrophysiology and Rhythmology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum , Bad Oeynhausen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aims Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCSs) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bed rest, to increase the patients’ comfort, and to reduce vascular access-related complications. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single-shot PVI to the actual standard of care [figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)]. Methods and results This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at three German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge. A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation [109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; P < 0.001], shorter time to haemostasis [1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; P < 0.001], and shorter time to discharge eligibility [270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; P < 0.001]. No major vascular access-related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access-related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group [7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); P = 0.063] as compared to the control group. Conclusion Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis, and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access-related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access-related complications.

Funder

Abbott Medical

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3