Affiliation:
1. Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute Overland Park Kansas USA
2. Department of Cardiology Montefiore Medical Center Bronx New York USA
3. Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute Austin Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionHemostasis following large‐bore femoral vein access remains a challenge. Manual compression has been the standard of care but requires bedside staff, prolonged bed rest, and longer length of stay. The LockeT is an external compression device that attempts to address these issues while achieving venous hemostasis.ObjectivesWe evaluate postprocedural hemostasis and vascular closure outcomes after using LockeT following cardiac electrophysiologic procedures.MethodsWe performed a single‐center, observational study of patients who underwent vascular closure for electrophysiology procedures using LockeT. Postprocedural outcomes were subsequently analyzed.ResultsWe studied 102 patients (N) for whom LockeT was used to close 182 separate vascular access sites (n). Common procedures were atrial fibrillation ablation (56.9%, N = 58) and left atrial appendage occlusion (28.4%, N = 29). Most often, 8‐Fr [48.3% (n = 126)], 11‐Fr [27.2% (n = 71)], and 8.5‐Fr [16.9% (n = 44)] sheaths were used, with an average procedure time of 82.1 ± 29.4 min. Hemostasis was achieved in 97.8% (n = 187) of all LockeT cases. Time to ambulation and discharge were 3.93 ± 1.10 h and 8.1 ± 4.4 h, respectively. No major complications were noted. Postprocedurally, 52% (N = 53) of patients were discharged on the same day. There were no differences in hemostasis (p = .859) or ambulation times (p = .202) between procedure types.ConclusionThe LockeT can effectively close venous access sites with no major complications.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Oh groin: What to do with thou?;Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology;2024-08-19