Abstract
Abstract
Motivated by the Basel III regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference36 articles.
1. Designing Realized Kernels to Measure the Ex Post Variation of Equity Prices in the Presence of Noise;Barndorff-Nielsen;Econometrica,2008
2. Realized Kernels in Practice: Trades and Quotes;Barndorff-Nielsen;Econometrics Journal,2009
3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Minimum capital requirements for market risk. Available from January (2016). http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d352.htm (accessed January 15, 2019).
4. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity;Bollerslev;Journal of Econometrics,1986
5. Advances in Forecast Evaluation;Clark,2013
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献