Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement

Author:

Feldman Richard

Abstract

Abstract Disagreements among intelligent and informed people pose challenging epistemological issues. One issue concerns the reasonableness of maintaining one’s beliefs in the light of such disagreement. Another concerns the possibility of there being cases in which both parties to a disagreement are reasonable in maintaining their beliefs. Attitudes toward disagreement are diverse. At one extreme are people who regard those with whom they disagree as enemies to be discredited, humiliated, and defeated. These people view disagreement as a kind of combat in which ‘victory’ is the measure of success. This attitude is especially prominent in some political exchanges. At another extreme are those who find disagreement unpleasant and preach a kind tolerance. This is especially prominent in religious disagreements.

Publisher

Oxford University PressOxford

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Epistemic negligence: between performance and evidence;Philosophical Studies;2024-08-20

2. Denklerin İhtilafı, Dinî İnanç ve Şüphecilik;Artuklu Akademi;2024-06-30

3. What is wrong with exclusivism? Religious exclusivism between epistemic overconfidence and epistemic humility;International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2024-06-15

4. Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement;Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie;2024-06-11

5. No hope for conciliationism;Synthese;2024-04-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3