Comparing Partitioned Models to Mixture Models: Do Information Criteria Apply?

Author:

Crotty Stephen M123ORCID,Holland Barbara R4

Affiliation:

1. School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

2. Center for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria

3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide, SA, Australia

4. School of Natural Sciences (Mathematics), University of Tasmania , Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia

Abstract

Abstract The use of information criteria to distinguish between phylogenetic models has become ubiquitous within the field. However, the variety and complexity of available models are much greater now than when these practices were established. The literature shows an increasing trajectory of healthy skepticism with regard to the use of information theory-based model selection within phylogenetics. We add to this by analyzing the specific case of comparison between partition and mixture models. We argue from a theoretical basis that information criteria are inherently more likely to favor partition models over mixture models, and we then demonstrate this through simulation. Based on our findings, we suggest that partition and mixture models are not suitable for information-theory based model comparison. [AIC, BIC; information criteria; maximum likelihood; mixture models; partitioned model; phylogenetics.]

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference33 articles.

1. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics;Brown;Syst. Biol.,2007

2. GHOST: recovering historical signal from heterotachously evolved sequence alignments;Crotty;Syst. Biol.,2020

3. Characterising genetic diversity in Cassava Brown Streak Virus;Crotty,2018

4. The impact of partitioning on phylogenomic accuracy;Darriba,2015

5. Modeling compositional heterogeneity;Foster;Syst. Biol.,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3