Effects of forcing differences and initial conditions on inter-model agreement in the VolMIP volc-pinatubo-full experiment
-
Published:2022-03-16
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:2265-2292
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Zanchettin DavideORCID, Timmreck ClaudiaORCID, Khodri MyriamORCID, Schmidt AnjaORCID, Toohey MatthewORCID, Abe ManabuORCID, Bekki SlimaneORCID, Cole JasonORCID, Fang Shih-WeiORCID, Feng WuhuORCID, Hegerl Gabriele, Johnson BenORCID, Lebas Nicolas, LeGrande Allegra N., Mann Graham W.ORCID, Marshall LaurenORCID, Rieger LandonORCID, Robock AlanORCID, Rubinetti SaraORCID, Tsigaridis KostasORCID, Weierbach HelenORCID
Abstract
Abstract. This paper provides initial results from a multi-model ensemble analysis based on the volc-pinatubo-full experiment performed within the Model Intercomparison Project on the climatic response to Volcanic forcing (VolMIP) as part of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The volc-pinatubo-full experiment is based on an ensemble of volcanic forcing-only climate simulations with the same volcanic aerosol dataset across the participating models (the 1991–1993 Pinatubo period from the CMIP6-GloSSAC dataset). The simulations are conducted within an idealized experimental design where initial states are sampled consistently across models from the CMIP6-piControl simulation providing unperturbed preindustrial background conditions. The multi-model ensemble includes output from an initial set of six participating Earth system models (CanESM5, GISS-E2.1-G, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC-E2SL, MPI-ESM1.2-LR
and UKESM1). The results show overall good agreement between the different models on the
global and hemispheric scales concerning the surface climate responses, thus demonstrating the overall effectiveness of VolMIP's experimental design. However, small yet significant inter-model discrepancies are found in radiative fluxes, especially in the tropics, that preliminary analyses link with minor differences in forcing implementation; model physics, notably aerosol–radiation interactions; the simulation and sampling of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO); and, possibly, the simulation of
climate feedbacks operating in the tropics. We discuss the volc-pinatubo-full protocol and highlight the advantages of volcanic forcing experiments defined within a carefully designed protocol with respect to emerging modelling approaches based on large ensemble transient simulations. We identify how the VolMIP strategy could be improved in future phases of the initiative to ensure a cleaner sampling protocol with greater focus on the evolving state of ENSO in the pre-eruption period.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference87 articles.
1. Abe, M.: Core code of MIROC-ES2L for CMIP6 VolMIP experiments, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5975701, 2022. 2. Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P., Janowiak, J.,
Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind, J.,
and Arkin, P.: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP)
Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, 2003. 3. Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Forcing,
feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate
models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607, 2012. 4. Archibald, A. T., O'Connor, F. M., Abraham, N. L., Archer-Nicholls, S.,
Chipperfield, M. P., Dalvi, M., Folberth, G. A., Dennison, F., Dhomse, S.
S., Griffiths, P. T., Hardacre, C., Hewitt, A. J., Hill, R. S., Johnson, C.
E., Keeble, J., Köhler, M. O., Morgenstern, O., Mulcahy, J. P., Ordóñez, C., Pope, R. J., Rumbold, S. T., Russo, M. R., Savage, N.
H., Sellar, A., Stringer, M., Turnock, S. T., Wild, O., and Zeng, G.:
Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry
scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1, Geosci. Model Dev., 13,
1223–1266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1223-2020, 2020. 5. Aumont, O., Ethé, C., Tagliabue, A., Bopp, L., and Gehlen, M.: PISCES-v2: An ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2465–2513, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015, 2015.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|