Virtual strike and dip – advancing inclusive and accessible field geology
-
Published:2022-03-01
Issue:1
Volume:5
Page:29-53
-
ISSN:2569-7110
-
Container-title:Geoscience Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Commun.
Author:
Bursztyn NatalieORCID, Sajjadi Pejman, Riegel Hannah, Huang Jiawei, Wallgrün Jan Oliver, Zhao Jiayan, Masters Bart, Klippel Alexander
Abstract
Abstract. Accessibility and inclusivity in field geology have become increasingly
important issues to address in geoscience education and have long been set
aside due to the tradition of field geology and the laborious task of making
it inclusive to all. Although a popular saying among geologists is “the
best geologists see the most rocks”, field trips cost money, time, and are
only accessible to those who are physically able to stay outside for extended periods. With the availability of 3D block diagrams, an onslaught of virtual
learning environments is becoming increasingly viable. Strike and dip is at
the core of any field geologist's education and career; learning and
practicing these skills is fundamental to making geologic maps and
understanding the regional geology of an area. In this paper, we present the Strike and Dip virtual tool (SaD) with the
objective of teaching the principles of strike and dip for geologic mapping
to introductory geology students. We embedded the SaD tool into an
introductory geology course and recruited 147 students to participate in the
study. Participants completed two maps using the SaD tool and reported on
their experiences through a questionnaire. Students generally perceived the
SaD tool positively. Furthermore, some individual differences among students
proved to be important contributing factors to their experiences and
subjective assessments of learning. When controlling for participants' past
experience with similar software, our results indicate that students highly
familiar with navigating geographical software perceived the virtual
environment of the tool to be significantly more realistic and easier to use
compared with those with lower levels of familiarity. Our results are
corroborated by a qualitative assessment of participants' feedback to two
open-ended questions, highlighting both the overall effectiveness of the SaD
tool and the effect of geographical software familiarity on measures of
experience and learning.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference86 articles.
1. Alles, M. and Riggs, E. M.: Developing a process model for visual penetrative ability, in: Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research, edited by: Feig, A. D. and Stokes, A., 756 Geological Society of America Special Paper 474, p. 63–80, https://doi.org/10.1130/2011.2474(06), 2011. 2. Almquist, H., Stanley, G., Blank, L., Hendrix, M., Rosenblatt, M., Hanfling,
S., and Crews, J.: An Integrated Field-Based Approach to Building Teachers'
Geoscience Skills, Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 31–40, 2018. 3. Andrews, G. D., Labishak, G., Brown, S., Isom, S. L., Pettus, H. D., and
Byers, T.: Teaching with Digital 3D Models of Minerals and Rocks, GSA
Today, 30, 42–43, 2020. 4. Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., and Stieff, M.: Situating space: using a
discipline-focused lens to examine spatial thinking skills, Cognitive
research: principles and implications, 5, 19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00210-z, 2020. 5. Bagher, M. M., Sajjadi, P., Wallgrün, J. O., La Femina, P. C., and Klippel, A.: Move The Object or Move The User: The Role of Interaction Techniques on Embodied Learning in VR, Front. Virtual Real., 2, 695312, https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.695312, 2021.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|