Validation of COSMIC ionospheric peak parameters by the measurements of an ionosonde chain in China
-
Published:2014-10-28
Issue:10
Volume:32
Page:1311-1319
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Hu L., Ning B., Liu L.ORCID, Zhao B., Li G.ORCID, Wu B., Huang Z., Hao X., Chang S., Wu Z.
Abstract
Abstract. Although the electron density profiles (EDPs) from Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) measurement have been validated by ionosonde data at a number of locations during the solar minimum period, the performance of COSMIC measurements at different latitudes has not been well evaluated, particularly during the solar maximum period. In this paper the COSMIC ionospheric peak parameters (peak electron density of the F region – NmF2; peak height of the F region – hmF2) are validated by the ionosonde data from an observation chain in China during the solar maximum period of 2011–2013. The validations show that the COSMIC measurement generally agrees well with the ionosonde observation. The error in NmF2 from COSMIC and ionosonde measurements varies with latitude. At midlatitude stations, the differences between COSMIC NmF2s and those of ionosondes are very slight. However, COSMIC NmF2 overestimates (underestimates) that of the ionosonde at the north (south) of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) crest. The relative errors of hmF2s are much lower than those of NmF2s at all stations, which indicates the EDP retrieval algorithm of the COSMIC measurement has a better performance in determining the ionospheric peak height. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) of NmF2s (hmF2s) are higher (lower) during the daytime than during the nighttime at all stations. Correlation analysis shows that the correlations for both NmF2s and hmF2s are comparably good (correlation coefficients > 0.9) at midlatitude stations, while correlations of NmF2 (correlation coefficients > 0.9) are higher than those of hmF2 (correlation coefficients > 0.8) at low-latitude stations.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference30 articles.
1. Cherniak, Iu. V. and Zakharenkova, I.: Validation of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC radio occultation electron density profiles by incoherent scatter radar data, Adv. Space Res., 53, 1304–1312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.02.010, 2014. 2. Chu, Y.-H., Su, C.-L., and Ko, H.-T.: A global survey of COSMIC ionospheric peak electron density and its height: A comparison with ground-based ionosonde measurements, Adv. Space Res., 46, 431–439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.10.014, 2010. 3. Chuo, Y.-J., Lee, C.-C., Chen, W.-S., and Reinisch, B. W.: Comparison between bottomside ionospheric profile parameters retrieved from FORMASAT3 measurements and ground-based observations collected at Jicamarca, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 73, 1665–1673, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.021, 2011. 4. Chuo, Y. J., Lee, C. C., Chen, W. S., and Reinisch, B. W.: Comparison of the characteristics of ionospheric parameters obtained from FORMOSAT-3 and digisonde over Ascension Island, Ann. Geophys., 31, 787–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-787-2013, 2013. 5. Ely, C. V., Batista, I. S., and Abdu, M. A.: Radio occultation electron density profiles from the FORMASAT-3/COSMIC satellites over the Brazilian region: A comparison with Digisonde data, Adv. Space Res., 49, 1553–1562, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.12.029, 2012.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|