Comparison of one- and two-filter detectors for atmospheric <sup>222</sup>Rn measurements under various meteorological conditions
-
Published:2010-06-28
Issue:3
Volume:3
Page:723-731
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Xia Y.,Sartorius H.,Schlosser C.,Stöhlker U.,Conen F.,Zahorowski W.
Abstract
Abstract. Parallel monitoring of 222Rn and its short-lived progeny (218Po and 214Pb) were carried out from November 2007 to April 2008 close to the top of the Schauinsland mountain, partly covered with forest, in South-West Germany. Samples were aspired from the same location at 2.5 m above ground level. We measured 222Rn with a dual flow loop, two-filter detector and its short-lived progeny with a one-filter detector. A reference sector for events, facing a steep valley and dominated by pasture, was used to minimize differences between 222Rn and progeny-derived 222Rn activity concentrations. In the two major wind sectors covered by forest to a distance between 60 m and 80 m towards the station progeny-derived 222Rn activity concentration was on average equal to 87% (without precipitation) and 74% (with precipitation) of 222Rn activity concentration. The observations show that most of the time both detector types follow the same pattern. Still, there is no single disequilibrium factor that could be used to exactly transform short-lived progeny to 222Rn activity concentration under all meteorological conditions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Akata, N., Kawabata, H., Hasegawa, H., Sato, T., Chikuchi, Y., Kondo, K., Hisamatsu, S., and Inaba, J.: Total deposition velocities and scavenging ratios of 7Be and 210Pb at Rokkasho, Japan, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 277(2) 347–355, 2008. 2. Biraud, S., Ciais, P., Ramonet, M., Simmonds, P., Kazan, V., Monfray, P., O'Doherty, S., Spain, T. G., and Jennings, S. G.: European greenhouse gas emissions estimated from continuous atmospheric measurement and radon-222 at Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 1351–1366, 2000. 3. Brunke, E. G., Labuschagne, C., Parker, B., van der Spuy, D., and Whittlestone, S.: Cape point GAW station 222Rn detector: factors affecting sensitivity and accuracy, Atmos. Environ., 36, 2257–2262, 2002. 4. Collé, R., Unterweger, M. P., Hutchinson, J. M. R., Whittlestone, S., Polian, G., Ardouin, B., Kay, J. G., Friend, J. P., Blomquist, B. W., Nadler, W., Dang, T. T., Larsen, R. J., and Hutter, A. R.: An international marine-atmospheric 222Rn measurement intercomparison in Bermuda Part II: Results for the participating laboratories, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 101, 21– , 1996. 5. Conen, F., Neftel, A., Schmid, M., and Lehmann, B. E.: N2O/Rn-222-soil flux calibration in the stable nocturnal surface layer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(2), 1025, , 2002.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|