A single-point modeling approach for the intercomparison and evaluation of ozone dry deposition across chemical transport models (Activity 2 of AQMEII4)
-
Published:2023-09-06
Issue:17
Volume:23
Page:9911-9961
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Clifton Olivia E.ORCID, Schwede DonnaORCID, Hogrefe ChristianORCID, Bash Jesse O.ORCID, Bland Sam, Cheung Philip, Coyle MhairiORCID, Emberson Lisa, Flemming JohannesORCID, Fredj ErickORCID, Galmarini StefanoORCID, Ganzeveld Laurens, Gazetas Orestis, Goded Ignacio, Holmes Christopher D.ORCID, Horváth László, Huijnen VincentORCID, Li Qian, Makar Paul A., Mammarella IvanORCID, Manca Giovanni, Munger J. WilliamORCID, Pérez-Camanyo Juan L., Pleim Jonathan, Ran Limei, San Jose Roberto, Silva Sam J., Staebler Ralf, Sun Shihan, Tai Amos P. K.ORCID, Tas EranORCID, Vesala Timo, Weidinger Tamás, Wu ZhiyongORCID, Zhang LeimingORCID
Abstract
Abstract. A primary sink of air pollutants and their precursors is dry
deposition. Dry deposition estimates differ across chemical transport
models, yet an understanding of the model spread is incomplete. Here, we
introduce Activity 2 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International
Initiative Phase 4 (AQMEII4). We examine 18 dry deposition schemes
from regional and global chemical transport models as well as standalone
models used for impact assessments or process understanding. We configure
the schemes as single-point models at eight Northern Hemisphere locations
with observed ozone fluxes. Single-point models are driven by a common set
of site-specific meteorological and environmental conditions. Five of eight
sites have at least 3 years and up to 12 years of ozone fluxes. The
interquartile range across models in multiyear mean ozone deposition
velocities ranges from a factor of 1.2 to 1.9 annually across sites and
tends to be highest during winter compared with summer. No model is within
50 % of observed multiyear averages across all sites and seasons, but some
models perform well for some sites and seasons. For the first time, we
demonstrate how contributions from depositional pathways vary across models.
Models can disagree with respect to relative contributions from the pathways, even when
they predict similar deposition velocities, or agree with respect to the relative
contributions but predict different deposition velocities. Both stomatal and
nonstomatal uptake contribute to the large model spread across sites. Our
findings are the beginning of results from AQMEII4 Activity 2, which brings
scientists who model air quality and dry deposition together with scientists
who measure ozone fluxes to evaluate and improve dry deposition schemes in
the chemical transport models used for research, planning, and regulatory
purposes.
Funder
Israel Science Foundation Integrated Carbon Observation System National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference212 articles.
1. Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson,
L. D.: The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and
implications for climate change, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 63, 637–661,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829, 2012. 2. Anav, A., Proietti, C., Menut, L., Carnicelli, S., De Marco, A., and Paoletti, E.: Sensitivity of stomatal conductance to soil moisture: implications for tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5747–5763, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5747-2018, 2018. 3. Andersson, C. and Engardt, M.: European ozone in a future climate:
Importance of changes in dry deposition and isoprene emissions, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, D02303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011690, 2010. 4. Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., Finco, A., Frost, G. J., Galbally, I. E., Gerosa, G., Granier, C., Griffiths, P. T., Hossaini, R., Hu, L., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Lin, M. Y., Mertens, M., Morgenstern, O., Naja, M., Naik, V., Oltmans, S., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L. E., Saiz-Lopez, A., Saxena, P., Shin, Y. M., Shahid, I., Shallcross, D., Tilmes, S., Trickl, T., Wallington, T. J., Wang, T., Worden, H. M., and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: A critical
review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to
2100, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 034, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034,
2020. 5. Baldocchi, D. D., Hicks, B. B., and Camara, P.: A canopy stomatal resistance
model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces, Atmos. Environ., 21,
91–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(87)90274-5, 1987.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|