Author:
Müller M. F.,Thompson S. E.
Abstract
Abstract. The prediction of flow duration curves (FDCs) in ungauged basins remains an important task for hydrologists given the practical relevance of FDCs for water management and infrastructure design. Predicting FDCs in ungauged basins typically requires spatial interpolation of statistical or model parameters. This task is complicated if climate becomes non-stationary, as the prediction challenge now also requires extrapolation through time. In this context, process-based models for FDCs that mechanistically link the streamflow distribution to climate and landscape factors may have an advantage over purely statistical methods to predict FDCs. This study compares a stochastic (process-based) and statistical method for FDC prediction in both stationary and non-stationary contexts, using Nepal as a case study. Under contemporary conditions, both models perform well in predicting FDCs, with Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients above 0.80 in 75 % of the tested catchments. The main drivers of uncertainty differ between the models: parameter interpolation was the main source of error for the statistical model, while violations of the assumptions of the process-based model represented the main source of its error. The process-based approach performed better than the statistical approach in numerical simulations with non-stationary climate drivers. The predictions of the statistical method under non-stationary rainfall conditions were poor if (i) local runoff coefficients were not accurately determined from the gauge network, or (ii) streamflow variability was strongly affected by changes in rainfall. A Monte Carlo analysis shows that the streamflow regimes in catchments characterized by frequent wet-season runoff and a rapid, strongly non-linear hydrologic response are particularly sensitive to changes in rainfall statistics. In these cases, process-based prediction approaches are favored over statistical models.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Alaouze, C. M.: Reservoir releases to uses with different reliability
requirements, AWRA Water Resour. Bull., 25, 1163–1168, 1989.
2. Alternative Energy Promotion Center: Construction and Installation Manual for
Micro Hydropower Project Installers, Government of Nepal, 2014 (in Nepalese).
3. Arora, M., Goel, N., Singh, P., and Singh, R.: Regional flow duration curve
for a Himalayan river Chenab, Nord. Hydrol., 36, 193–206, 2005.
4. Basso, S. and Botter, G.: Streamflow variability and optimal capacity of
run-of-river hydropower plants, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10527,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012017, 2012.
5. Bélisle, C. J.: Convergence theorems for a class of simulated annealing
algorithms on Rd, J. Appl. Probab., 29, 885–895, 1992.
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献