Characteristics of the derived energy dissipation rate using the 1 Hz commercial aircraft quick access recorder (QAR) data
-
Published:2022-04-14
Issue:7
Volume:15
Page:2277-2298
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Kim Soo-Hyun, Kim Jeonghoe, Kim Jung-HoonORCID, Chun Hye-Yeong
Abstract
Abstract. The cube root of the energy dissipation rate (EDR), as a
standard reporting metric of atmospheric turbulence, is estimated using 1 Hz
quick access recorder (QAR) data from Korean-based national air carriers
with two different types of aircraft (Boeing 737 (B737) and Boeing 777 (B777)), archived
for 12 months from January to December 2012. The EDRs are estimated using
three wind components (zonal, meridional, and derived vertical wind) and the
derived equivalent vertical gust (DEVG) of the 1 Hz post-flight data by
applying all possible EDR methods. Wind components are used to calculate
three different EDRs, utilizing the second-order structure function, power
spectral density, and von Kármán wind spectrum and maximum-likelihood method. In addition, two DEVG-based EDRs are calculated using the
lognormal mapping technique and the predefined parabolic relationship
between the observed EDR and DEVG. When the reliability of lower-rate (1 Hz)
data to estimate the EDR is examined using the higher-rate (20 Hz) wind data
obtained from a tall tower observatory, it is found that the 1 Hz EDR can be
underestimated (2.19 %–12.56 %) or overestimated (9.32 %–10.91 %). In this
study, it is also found that the structure-function-based EDR shows lower
uncertainty (2.19 %–8.14 %) than the energy spectrum-based EDRs
(9.32 %–12.56 %) when the 1 Hz datasets are used. The observed EDR estimates
using 1 Hz QAR data are examined in three strong turbulence cases that are
relevant to clear-air turbulence (CAT), mountain wave turbulence (MWT), and
convectively induced turbulence (CIT). The observed EDR estimates derived
from three different wind components show different characteristics
depending on potential sources of atmospheric turbulence at cruising
altitudes, indicating good agreement with selected strong turbulence cases
with respect to turbulence intensity and incident time. Zonal wind-based
EDRs are stronger in the CAT case that is affected by synoptic-scale forcing
such as upper-level jet/frontal system. In the CIT case, vertical wind-based
EDRs are stronger, which is related to convectively induced gravity waves
outside the cloud boundary. The MWT case has a peak of the EDR based on both
the zonal and vertical winds, which can be related to the propagation of
mountain waves and their subsequent breaking. It is also found that the CAT
and MWT cases occurred by synoptic-scale forcing have longer variations in
the observed EDRs before and after the turbulence incident, while the CIT
case triggered by a mesoscale convective cell has an isolated peak of the
EDR. Current results suggest that the 1 Hz aircraft data can be an
additional source of the EDR estimations contributing to expand more EDR
information at the cruising altitudes in the world and that these data can
be helpful to provide a better climatology of aviation turbulence and a
situational awareness of cruising aircraft.
Funder
Korea Meteorological Administration National Research Foundation of Korea
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference78 articles.
1. Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K., Krishnamurthy, R., Pekour, M., Berg, L. K., and Choukulkar, A.: Spatial and temporal variability of turbulence dissipation rate in complex terrain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4367–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4367-2019, 2019. 2. Bramberger, M., Dörnbrack, A., Wilms, H., Gemsa, S., Raynor, K., and
Sharman, R. D.: Vertically propagating mountain wave – A hazard for high-
flying aircraft?, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 57, 1957–1975,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0340.1, 2018. 3. Champagne, F. H., Friehe, C. A., Larue, J. C., and Wynagaard, J. C.: Flux
measurements, flux estimation techniques, and fine-scale turbulence
measurements in the unstable surface layer over land, J. Atmos. Sci., 34,
515–530, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0515:FMFETA>2.0.CO;2, 1977. 4. Cho, J. Y. N. and Lindborg, E.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in
the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: 1. Observations, J. Geophys.
Res., 106, 10223–10232, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900814, 2001. 5. Cho, J. Y. N., Newell, R. E., Anderson, B. E., Barrick, J. D. W., and
Thornhill, K. L.: Characterizations of tropospheric turbulence and stability
layers from aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8784,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002820, 2003.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|