Performance-based sub-selection of CMIP6 models for impact assessments in Europe
-
Published:2023-04-21
Issue:2
Volume:14
Page:457-483
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
Palmer Tamzin E., McSweeney Carol F., Booth Ben B. B., Priestley Matthew D. K.ORCID, Davini PaoloORCID, Brunner LukasORCID, Borchert LeonardORCID, Menary Matthew B.
Abstract
Abstract. We have created a performance-based assessment of CMIP6 models for Europe that can be used to inform the sub-selection of models for this region. Our assessment covers criteria indicative of the ability of individual models to capture a range of large-scale processes that are important for the representation of present-day European climate. We use this study to provide examples of how this performance-based assessment may be applied to a multi-model ensemble of CMIP6 models to (a) filter the ensemble for performance against these climatological and processed-based criteria and (b) create a smaller subset of models based on performance that also maintains model diversity and the filtered projection range as far as possible. Filtering by excluding the least-realistic models leads to higher-sensitivity models remaining in the ensemble as an emergent consequence of the assessment. This results in both the 25th percentile and the median of the projected temperature range being shifted towards greater warming for the filtered set of models. We also weight the unfiltered ensemble against global trends. In contrast, this shifts the distribution towards less warming. This highlights a tension for regional model selection in terms of selection based on regional climate processes versus the global mean warming trend.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference98 articles.
1. Ashfaq, M., Rastogi, D., Kitson, J., Abid, M. A., and Kao, S.-C.: Evaluation of
CMIP6 GCMs Over the CONUS for Downscaling Studies, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036659,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036659, 2022. a 2. Athanasiadis, P. J., Ogawa, F., Omrani, N.-E., Keenlyside, N., Schiemann, R.,
Baker, A. J., Vidale, P. L., Bellucci, A., Ruggieri, P., Haarsma, R., and Roberts, M.:
Mitigating climate biases in the midlatitude North Atlantic by increasing
model resolution: SST gradients and their relation to blocking and the jet,
J. Clim., 35, 3385–3406, 2022. a 3. Bellomo, K., Angeloni, M., Corti, S., and von Hardenberg, J.: Future climate
change shaped by inter-model differences in Atlantic meridional overturning
circulation response, Nat. Commun., 12, 3659,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24015-w, 2021. a 4. Bock, L., Lauer, A., Schlund, M., Barreiro, M., Bellouin, N., Jones, C., Meehl,
G. A., Predoi, V., Roberts, M. J., and Eyring, V.: Quantifying Progress
Across Different CMIP Phases With the ESMValTool, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032321, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032321,
2020. a, b 5. Booth, B. B. B., Dunstone, N. J., Halloran, P. R., Andrews, T., and Bellouin,
N.: Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North
Atlantic climate variability, Nature, 484, 228–232,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10946, 2012. a
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|