How alkaline compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity
-
Published:2021-10-15
Issue:19
Volume:21
Page:14983-15001
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Karydis Vlassis A.ORCID, Tsimpidi Alexandra P., Pozzer AndreaORCID, Lelieveld JosORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The acidity of atmospheric particulate matter regulates its mass, composition, and toxicity and has important consequences for public health, ecosystems and climate. Despite these broad impacts, the global distribution and evolution of aerosol particle acidity are unknown. We used the comprehensive atmospheric multiphase chemistry–climate model EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry) to investigate the main factors that control aerosol particle acidity and uncovered remarkable variability and unexpected trends during the past 50 years in different parts of the world. Aerosol particle acidity decreased strongly over Europe and North America during the past decades while at the same time it increased over Asia. Our simulations revealed that these particle acidity trends are strongly related to changes in the phase partitioning of nitric acid, production of sulfate in aqueous aerosols, and the aerosol hygroscopicity. It is remarkable that the aerosol hygroscopicity (κ) has increased in many regions following the particle pH. Overall, we find that alkaline compounds, notably ammonium and to a lesser extent crustal cations, regulate the particle pH on a global scale. Given the importance of aerosol particles for the atmospheric energy budget, cloud formation, pollutant deposition, and public health, alkaline species hold the key to control strategies for air quality and climate change.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference97 articles.
1. Abdelkader, M., Metzger, S., Mamouri, R. E., Astitha, M., Barrie, L., Levin, Z., and Lelieveld, J.: Dust-air pollution dynamics over the eastern Mediterranean, Atmos.Chem. Phys., 15, 9173–9189,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9173-2015, 2015. 2. Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S.,
Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and
domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. 3. Andreae, M. O., Talbot, R. W., Andreae, T. W., and Harriss, R. C.: Formic
and acetic-acid over the central Amazon region, Brazil. 1. dry season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 1616–1624, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD02p01616, 1988. 4. Ansari, A. S. and Pandis, S. N.: The effect of metastable equilibrium states on the partitioning of nitrate between the gas and aerosol phases, Atmos. Environ., 34, 157–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00242-3, 2000. 5. Bacer, S., Sullivan, S. C., Karydis, V. A., Barahona, D., Kramer, M., Nenes,
A., Tost, H., Tsimpidi, A. P., Lelieveld, J., and Pozzer, A.: Implementation
of a comprehensive ice crystal formation parameterization for cirrus and
mixed-phase clouds in the EMAC model (based on MESSy 2.53), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4021–4041, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4021-2018, 2018.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|