The making of the New European Wind Atlas – Part 1: Model sensitivity
-
Published:2020-10-27
Issue:10
Volume:13
Page:5053-5078
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Hahmann Andrea N.ORCID, Sīle TijaORCID, Witha Björn, Davis Neil N.ORCID, Dörenkämper MartinORCID, Ezber YaseminORCID, García-Bustamante ElenaORCID, González-Rouco J. Fidel, Navarro Jorge, Olsen Bjarke T.ORCID, Söderberg Stefan
Abstract
Abstract. This is the first of two papers that document the creation of the New European Wind Atlas (NEWA). It describes the sensitivity analysis and evaluation procedures that formed the basis for choosing the final setup of the mesoscale model simulations of the wind atlas. The suitable combination of model setup and parameterizations, bound by practical constraints, was found for simulating the climatology of the wind field at turbine-relevant heights with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Initial WRF model sensitivity experiments compared the wind climate generated by using two commonly used planetary boundary layer schemes and were carried out over several regions in Europe. They confirmed that the most significant differences in annual mean wind speed at 100 m a.g.l. (above ground level) mostly coincide with areas of high surface roughness length and not with the location of the domains or maximum wind speed. Then an ensemble of more than 50 simulations with different setups for a single year was carried out for one domain covering northern Europe for which tall mast observations were available. We varied many different parameters across the simulations, e.g. model version, forcing data, various physical parameterizations, and the size of the model domain. These simulations showed that although virtually every parameter change affects the results in some way, significant changes in the wind climate in the boundary layer are mostly due to using different physical parameterizations, especially the planetary boundary layer scheme, the representation of the land surface, and the prescribed surface roughness length. Also, the setup of the simulations, such as the integration length and the domain size, can considerably influence the results. We assessed the degree of similarity between winds simulated by the WRF ensemble members and the observations using a suite of metrics, including the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD), a statistic that measures the distance between two probability distributions. The EMD was used to diagnose the performance of each ensemble member using the full wind speed and direction distribution, which is essential for wind resource assessment. We identified the most realistic ensemble members to determine the most suitable configuration to be used in the final production run, which is fully described and evaluated in the second part of this study (Dörenkämper et al., 2020).
Funder
Danida Fellowship Centre Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad Latvijas Zinatnu Akademija European Commission
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference93 articles.
1. Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E.: A land use
and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data, Tech. rep., United States Geological Service, availabl e at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0964/report.pdf (last access: 18 October 2020), 1976. a 2. Badger, J., Frank, H., Hahmann, A. N., and Giebel, G.: Wind-climate estimation based on mesoscale and microscale modeling: Statistical-dynamical downscaling for wind energy applications, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 53, 1901–1919, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0147.1, 2014. a 3. Benjamin, S. G., Grell, G. A., Brown, J. M., and Smirnova, T. G.: Mesoscale
weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic-terrain-following coordinate model, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 473–494,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0473:MWPWTR>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a 4. Bosveld, F. C.: Cabauw In-situ Observational Program 2000 – Now: Instruments, Calibrations and Set-up, Tech. rep., KNMI, available at:
http://projects.knmi.nl/cabauw/insitu/observations/documentation/Cabauw_TR/Cabauw_TR.pdf
(last access: 28 June 2018), 2019. a 5. Chávez-Arroyo, R., Lozano-Galiana, S., Sanz-Rodrigo, J., and Probst, O.:
Statistical-dynamical downscaling of wind fields using self-organizing maps, Appl. Therm. Eng., 75, 1201–1209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.002, 2015. a
Cited by
94 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|