EDDA 2.0: integrated simulation of debris flow initiation and dynamics considering two initiation mechanisms
-
Published:2018-07-13
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:2841-2856
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Shen Ping, Zhang LiminORCID, Chen Hongxin, Fan Ruilin
Abstract
Abstract. Climate change is resulting in more frequent rainstorms and more
rain-induced debris flows in mountainous areas. The prediction of likely
hazard zones is important for debris flow risk assessment and management.
Existing numerical methods for debris flow analysis often require the input
of hydrographs at prescribed initiation locations, ignoring the initiation
process and leading to large uncertainties in debris flow initiation
locations, times, and volumes when applied to regional debris flow analysis.
The evolution of the flowing mixture in time and space is also barely addressed.
This paper presents a new integrated numerical model, EDDA 2.0, to
simulate the whole process of debris flow initiation, motion, entrainment,
deposition, and property changes. Two physical initiation mechanisms are
modelled: transformation from slope failures and surface erosion. Three
numerical tests and field application to a catastrophic debris flow event are
conducted to verify the model components and evaluate the model performance.
The results indicate that the integrated model is capable of simulating the
initiation and subsequent flowing process of rain-induced debris flows, as
well as the physical evolution of the flowing mixture. The integrated model
provides a powerful tool for analysing multi-hazard processes, hazard
interactions, and regional debris flow risk assessment in the future.
Funder
Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference78 articles.
1. Archfield, S. A., Steeves, P. A., Guthrie, J. D., and Ries III, K. G.:
Towards a publicly available, map-based regional software tool to estimate
unregulated daily streamflow at ungauged rivers, Geosci. Model Dev., 6,
101-115, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-101-2013, 2013. 2. Baum, R. L. and Godt, J. W.: Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow
landslides and debris flows in the USA, Landslides, 7, 259–272,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0, 2010. 3. Bartelt, P., Buehler, Y., Christen, M., Deubelbeiss, Y., Graf, C., McArdell,
B., Salz, M., and Schneider, M.: A numerical model for debris flow in
research and practice, User Manual v1.5 Debris Flow, WSL Institute for Snow
and Avalanche Research SLF, Switzerland, 2013. 4. Beguería, S., Van Asch, Th. W. J., Malet, J.-P., and Gröndahl, S.: A
GIS-based numerical model for simulating the kinematics of mud and debris
flows over complex terrain, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 1897–1909,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1897-2009, 2009. 5. Berti, M. and Simoni, A.: Experimental evidences and numerical modelling of
debris flow initiated by channel runoff, Landslides, 2, 171–182,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0062-4, 2005.
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|