Water uptake patterns of pea and barley responded to drought but not to cropping systems
-
Published:2022-04-01
Issue:6
Volume:19
Page:1853-1869
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Sun QingORCID, Klaus Valentin H.ORCID, Wittwer RaphaëlORCID, Liu Yujie, van der Heijden Marcel G. A., Gilgen Anna K., Buchmann NinaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Agricultural production is under threat of water scarcity
due to increasingly frequent and severe drought events under climate change.
Whether a change in cropping systems can be used as an effective adaptation
strategy against drought is still unclear. We investigated how plant water
uptake patterns of a field-grown pea–barley (Pisum sativum L. and Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture, an
important fodder intercrop, responded to experimental drought under four
cropping systems, i.e. organic intensive tillage, conventional intensive
tillage, conventional no tillage, and organic reduced tillage. Drought was
simulated after crop establishment using rain shelters. Proportional
contributions to plant water uptake from different soil layers were
estimated based on stable water isotopes using Bayesian mixing models. Pea
plants always took up proportionally more water from shallower depths than
barley plants. Water uptake patterns of neither species were affected by
cropping systems. Both species showed similar responses to the drought
simulation and increased their proportional water uptake from the shallow soil
layer (0–20 cm) in all cropping systems. Our results highlight the impact of
drought on plant water uptake patterns for two important crop species and
suggest that cropping systems might not be as successful as adaptation
strategies against drought as previously thought.
Funder
ETH Zürich Foundation Stiftung Mercator Schweiz
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference86 articles.
1. Adams, M. A., Buchmann, N., Sprent, J., Buckley, T. N., and Turnbull, T.
L.: Crops, nitrogen, water: Are legumes friend, foe, or misunderstood ally?,
Trends Plant Sci., 23, 539–550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.009, 2018. 2. Araki, H. and Iijima, M.: Stable isotope analysis of water extraction from
subsoil in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by drought and soil compaction,
Plant Soil, 270, 147–157, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-1304-2, 2005. 3. Bachmann, D., Gockele, A., Ravenek, J. M., Roscher, C., Strecker, T.,
Weigelt, A., and Buchmann, N.: No evidence of complementary water use along
a plant species richness gradient in temperate experimental grasslands, Plos
One, 10, e0116367, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116367, 2015. 4. Barnard, R. L., de Bello, F., Gilgen, A. K., and Buchmann, N.: The δ18O of root crown water best reflects source water δ18O
in different types of herbaceous species, Rapid Commun. Mass
Sp., 20, 3799–3802, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2778, 2006. 5. Barry, K. E., van Ruijven, J., Mommer, L., Bai, Y. F., Beierkuhnlein, C.,
Buchmann, N., de Kroon, H., Ebeling, A., Eisenhauer, N.,
Guimaraes-Steinicke, C., Hildebrandt, A., Isbell, F., Milcu, A., Nesshover,
C., Reich, P. B., Roscher, C., Sauheitl, L., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid,
B., Tilman, D., von Felten, S., and Weigelt, A.: Limited evidence for
spatial resource partitioning across temperate grassland biodiversity
experiments, Ecology, 101, e02905, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2905, 2020.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|