Airborne remote sensing and in situ measurements of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> to quantify point source emissions
-
Published:2018-02-07
Issue:2
Volume:11
Page:721-739
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Krings Thomas, Neininger BrunoORCID, Gerilowski Konstantin, Krautwurst SvenORCID, Buchwitz MichaelORCID, Burrows John P.ORCID, Lindemann Carsten, Ruhtz ThomasORCID, Schüttemeyer Dirk, Bovensmann HeinrichORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Reliable techniques to infer greenhouse gas emission rates from localised sources require accurate measurement and inversion approaches. In this study airborne remote sensing observations of CO2 by the MAMAP instrument and airborne in situ measurements are used to infer emission estimates of carbon dioxide released from a cluster of coal-fired power plants. The study area is complex due to sources being located in close proximity and overlapping associated carbon dioxide plumes. For the analysis of in situ data, a mass balance approach is described and applied, whereas for the remote sensing observations an inverse Gaussian plume model is used in addition to a mass balance technique. A comparison between methods shows that results for all methods agree within 10 % or better with uncertainties of 10 to 30 % for cases in which in situ measurements were made for the complete vertical plume extent. The computed emissions for individual power plants are in agreement with results derived from emission factors and energy production data for the time of the overflight.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference34 articles.
1. Ackerman, K. V. and Sundquist, E. T.: Comparison of Two U.S. Power-Plant Carbon Dioxide Emissions Data Sets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5688–5693, https://doi.org/10.1021/es800221q, 2008. 2. Bovensmann, H., Buchwitz, M., Burrows, J. P., Reuter, M., Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Schneising, O., Heymann, J., Tretner, A., and Erzinger, J.: A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO2 emissions from space and related applications, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 781–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-781-2010, 2010. 3. Bovensmann, H., Krings, T., Gerilowski, K., Neininger, B., Ruhtz, T., and Lindemann, C.: C-MAPExp Final Report – “Scientific and Technical Assistance for the Deployment of a flexible airborne spectrometer system during C-MAPExp”, ESA Study, 2014. 4. Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V. V., and Burrows, J. P.: A near-infrared optimized DOAS method for the fast global retrieval of atmospheric CH4, CO, CO2, H2O, and N2O total column amounts from SCIAMACHY Envisat-1 nadir radiances, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15231–15245, 2000. 5. Buchwitz, M., Reuter, M., Bovensmann, H., Pillai, D., Heymann, J., Schneising, O., Rozanov, V., Krings, T., Burrows, J. P., Boesch, H., Gerbig, C., Meijer, Y., and Löscher, A.: Carbon Monitoring Satellite (CarbonSat): assessment of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 retrieval errors by error parameterization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3477–3500, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3477-2013, 2013.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|