GTS v1.0: a macrophysics scheme for climate models based on a probability density function
-
Published:2021-01-12
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:177-204
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Shiu Chein-Jung, Wang Yi-ChiORCID, Hsu Huang-Hsiung, Chen Wei-Ting, Pan Hua-Lu, Sun Ruiyu, Chen Yi-HsuanORCID, Chen Cheng-An
Abstract
Abstract. Cloud macrophysics schemes are unique parameterizations for general
circulation models. We propose an approach based on a probability density
function (PDF) that utilizes cloud condensates and saturation ratios to
replace the assumption of critical relative humidity (RH). We test this
approach, called the Global
Forecast System (GFS) – Taiwan Earth System
Model (TaiESM) – Sundqvist (GTS) scheme, using the
macrophysics scheme within the Community Atmosphere Model version 5.3
(CAM5.3) framework. Via single-column model results, the new approach
simulates the cloud fraction (CF)–RH distributions closer to those of the
observations when compared to those of the default CAM5.3 scheme. We also
validate the impact of the GTS scheme on global climate simulations with
satellite observations. The simulated CF is comparable to CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol
Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO)
data. Comparisons of the vertical distributions of CF and cloud water
content (CWC), as functions of large-scale dynamic and thermodynamic
parameters, with the CloudSat/CALIPSO data suggest that the GTS scheme can
closely simulate observations. This is particularly noticeable for
thermodynamic parameters, such as RH, upper-tropospheric temperature, and
total precipitable water, implying that our scheme can simulate variation in
CF associated with RH more reliably than the default scheme. Changes in CF
and CWC would affect climatic fields and large-scale circulation via
cloud–radiation interaction. Both climatological means and annual cycles
of many of the GTS-simulated variables are improved compared with the
default scheme, particularly with respect to water vapor and RH fields.
Different PDF shapes in the GTS scheme also significantly affect global
simulations.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference59 articles.
1. Austin, R. T., Heymsfield, A. J., and Stephens, G. L.: Retrieval of ice
cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and
temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00A23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010049, 2009. 2. Bogenschutz, P. A. and Krueger, S. K.: A simplified pdf parameterization of
subgrid-scale clouds and turbulence for cloud-resolving models, J.
Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 195–211, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20018,
2013. 3. Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Larson, V. E., Schanen, D. P., Meyer, N. R., and Craig, C.: Unified parameterization of the planetary boundary layer and shallow convection with a higher-order turbulence closure in the Community Atmosphere Model: single-column experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1407–1423, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1407-2012, 2012. 4. Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Larson, V. E., Craig, C.,
and Schanen, D. S.: Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on
Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Climate, 26,
9655–9676, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1, 2013. 5. Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK,
2013.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|