Mapping the terrain of simulation faculty development: protocol for a scoping review

Author:

Gardner Aimee1,Steinert Yvonne2,Rodgers David3,Rohra Anita1,Peterson Dawn Taylor4,Viggers Sandra5,Davis Rachel1,Condron Claire6,Eppich Walter6,Ouellette Lara1,Reedy Gabriel7

Affiliation:

1. 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

2. 2McGill University School of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

3. 3Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN, USA

4. 4Medical Education, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

5. 5Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark

6. 6RCSI SIM Centre for Simulation Education and Research Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland

7. 7Centre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

This scoping review aims to examine and map the current state of faculty development for healthcare simulation educators. This review will include an exploration of the range and type of faculty development programs designed to enhance simulation-based education (SBE). Simulation has become a staple method for educating health professionals, but no standard approaches exist for training simulation instructors, both for initial training and ongoing professional development. As this education modality continues to expand, there is a need to better understand what interventions and approaches improve the knowledge, skills, abilities and other attributes (KSAOs) for those who are responsible for the design, delivery and evaluation of simulation-based educational sessions. This scoping review will consider empirical research and other relevant published works that address faculty development for simulation educators in health professions education. This will include faculty development interventions, conceptual and theoretical frameworks, recommendations for implementation and other discussions of issues related to faculty development for SBE. These may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, qualitative studies, commentaries and perspectives. The following electronic databases will be searched: Medline (Ovid); EMBASE (Ovid); CINAHL (EBSCO); ERIC (EBSCO); PsycInfo (Ovid); and Web of Science without time limits. Reference lists of eligible studies will be back-searched, and Google Scholar and Scopus will be used for forward citation tracking. The findings will be summarized in tabular form and a narrative synthesis, to inform recommendations and areas for future research and practice.

Publisher

Adi Health+Wellness

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3