Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Adoption of Virtual Care in General Practice in 20 Countries (inSIGHT): Protocol and Rationale Study

Author:

Neves Ana LuísaORCID,Li EdmondORCID,Serafini AliceORCID,Jimenez GeronimoORCID,Lingner HeidrunORCID,Koskela Tuomas HORCID,Hoffman Robert DORCID,Collins ClaireORCID,Petek DavorinaORCID,Claveria AnaORCID,Tsopra RosyORCID,Irving GregORCID,Gusso GustavoORCID,O’Neill Braden GregoryORCID,Hoedebecke KyleORCID,Espitia Sandra MilenaORCID,Ungan MehmetORCID,Nessler KatarzynaORCID,Lazic VanjaORCID,Laranjo LilianaORCID,Memarian EnsiehORCID,Fernandez Maria JoseORCID,Ghafur SairaORCID,Fontana GianlucaORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Car JosipORCID,Darzi AraORCID

Abstract

Background In recent decades, virtual care has emerged as a promising option to support primary care delivery. However, despite the potential, adoption rates remained low. With the outbreak of COVID-19, it has suddenly been pushed to the forefront of care delivery. As we progress into the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need and opportunity to review the impact remote care had in primary care settings and reassess its potential future role. Objective This study aims to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and family doctors on the (1) use of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) perceived impact on quality and safety of care, and (3) essential factors for high-quality and sustainable use of virtual care in the future. Methods This study used an online cross-sectional questionnaire completed by GPs distributed across 20 countries. The survey was hosted in Qualtrics and distributed using email, social media, and the researchers’ personal contact networks. GPs were eligible for the survey if they were working mainly in primary care during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed for quantitative variables, and relationships between the use of virtual care and perceptions on impact on quality and safety of care and participants’ characteristics may be explored. Qualitative data (free-text responses) will be analyzed using framework analysis. Results Data collection took place from June 2020 to September 2020. As of this manuscript’s submission, a total of 1605 GP respondents participated in the questionnaire. Further data analysis is currently ongoing. Conclusions The study will provide a comprehensive overview of the availability of virtual care technologies, perceived impact on quality and safety of care, and essential factors for high-quality future use. In addition, a description of the underlying factors that influence this adoption and perceptions, in both individual GP and family doctor characteristics and the context in which they work, will be provided. While the COVID-19 pandemic may prove the first great stress test of the capabilities, capacity, and robustness of digital systems currently in use, remote care will likely remain an increasingly common approach in the future. There is an imperative to identify the main lessons from this unexpected transformation and use them to inform policy decisions and health service design. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/30099

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Kaiser Permanente Northern California: Current Experiences With Internet, Mobile, And Video Technologies

2. Market study on telemedicineEuropean Commission20182021-07-30https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/ehealth/docs/2018_provision_marketstudy_telemedicine_en.pdf

3. eHealth adoption in primary healthcare in the EU is on the riseEuropean Commission20182021-07-30https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ehealth-adoption-primary-healthcare-eu-rise

4. Use and Content of Primary Care Office-Based vs Telemedicine Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US

5. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3