Factors associated with the availability of virtual consultations in primary care across 20 countries: A cross-sectional study (Preprint)

Author:

Kerr GabrieleORCID,Greenfield GevaORCID,Li EdmondORCID,Beaney ThomasORCID,Hayhoe Benedict WJORCID,Car JosipORCID,Clavería AnaORCID,Collins ClaireORCID,Gusso GustavoORCID,Hoffman Robert DORCID,Jimenez GeronimoORCID,Koskela Tuomas HORCID,Laranjo LilianaORCID,Lingner HeidrunORCID,Memarian EnsiehORCID,Nessler KatarzynaORCID,Petek DavorinaORCID,Tsopra RosyORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Neves Ana LuisaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual consultations represent a notable change in healthcare delivery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of virtual consultations is critical in assessing healthcare system resilience and adaptability in times of crisis.

OBJECTIVE

(1) To describe the availability and hours of use of telephone, video and human chat consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, and (2) identify factors associated with their availability.

METHODS

Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) from 20 upper-middle and high-income countries completed a cross-sectional online survey in 2020. Factors associated with availability were investigated using chi-squared tests and effect size (ES) estimates calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,370 PCPs were included in this study (85.4% of the total sample of 1,605). Telephone consultations were the most frequently available type of virtual consultations before and during the pandemic (73.1% and 90.4%, respectively). Significant increases in availability and use were observed during the pandemic for all the types of virtual consultations. The largest absolute increase in availability was observed for video consultations (39.5%), followed by telephone (17.3%) and chat (8.6%) (all P<.0001). The largest increase in use was observed for telephone consultations (+11.0 hours per week, P<.0001). Digital maturity of the practice was weakly associated with availability of video consultations both before (ES: 0.2) and during (ES: 0.2) the pandemic (P<.0001 for both), and with chat consultations before the pandemic only (ES: 0.1, P=.001). Greater availability of video and chat consultations was found in PCPs who had completed digital health training, both before and during the pandemic (P<.0001 for all). There was significant country-level variation in the use and availabilities of the technologies between both time periods. The association between country and the availability of telephone consultations changed from strong (ES: 0.5, P<.0001) to weak (ES: 0.2, P=.03), while the relationship between country and video consultations changed from moderate (ES: 0.3, P<.0001) to strong (ES: 0.5, P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the availability of virtual consultations globally, and how contextual factors, predominantly digital maturity, digital health training, and country, were associated with the availability of virtual consultations. Further exploration of drivers of availability, particularly at the national level, is needed to ensure sustained and effective implementation of virtual consultations.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/30099

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3