Factors influencing Primary Care Physicians recommending patients to use digital health technologies for self-management: A cross-sectional study across 20 countries (Preprint)

Author:

Odunlami Wuraola OluwayomiORCID,Greenfield GevaORCID,Li EdmondORCID,El-Osta AustenORCID,Tsopra RosyORCID,Lingner HeidrunORCID,Memarian EnsiehORCID,Hoffman RobertORCID,Nessler KatarzynaORCID,Jimenez GeronimoORCID,Collins ClaireORCID,Petek DavorinaORCID,Clavería AnaORCID,Fernández Maria JoséORCID,Gusso GustavoORCID,Ungan MehmetORCID,Irving GregORCID,Laranjo LilianaORCID,Ghafur SairaORCID,Fontana GianlucaORCID,Car JosipORCID,Hayhoe BenedictORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Neves Ana LuisaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expanding access to self-management via Digital Health Technologies may supplement traditional care, mitigating pressures on primary care through self-management. Primary Care Physicians can play a critical role in the integration of digital health technologies into patient care, but it is unclear what factors influence Primary Care Physicians’ recommendation of such technologies.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors associated with Primary Care Physicians recommending digital health technologies to patients for self-management before, and during the pandemic.

METHODS

Primary Care Physicians across 20 countries completed an online questionnaire between June-September 2020. The outcome was self-report of recommending patients to at least one of six listed forms of digital health technologies (symptom checker/self-assessment tools, online information resources, health trackers, and mindfulness apps, online counselling and crisis resolution services). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify factors associated with recommending digital health technologies to patients before and during the pandemic. McNemar's Chi-squared (χ2) test was used to analyse changes during the pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 1,592 Primary Care Physicians were included. Before the pandemic, odds of recommending digital health technologies for self-management were lower for Primary Care Physicians not involved in teaching (aOR 0.64, 95%CI 0.51-0.8), or practising in Turkey, Australia, Chile, Colombia, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain (aORs range: aOR 0.18, 95%CI 0.1-0.34 [Turkey]; aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93) [Australia]). During the pandemic, Primary Care Physicians practising in rural settings had higher odds of starting to recommend digital health technologies (aOR=2.07 [1.19-3.58], as well as those from Brazil, Colombia, and Italy (aOR= 3.18 [1.13-8.76]; 6.89 [2.97-16.6] and 3.85 [1.85-8.21], respectively]. There was no significant difference in recommending digital health technologies before and during the pandemic (53.2% vs 54.7%, P=0.215).

CONCLUSIONS

Involvement in teaching (pre-pandemic) and practising in a rural setting (during the pandemic) positively influenced recommendation of digital health technologies. Significant variation in recommending digital health technologies was present across countries. Further research is indicated to better understand potential drivers of variation, including characteristics of the populations served, as well as national health systems and policies.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3