Accuracy of Vital Signs Measurements by a Smartwatch and a Portable Health Device: Validation Study

Author:

Hahnen ChristinaORCID,Freeman Cecilia GORCID,Haldar NilanjanORCID,Hamati Jacquelyn NORCID,Bard Dylan MORCID,Murali VigneshORCID,Merli Geno JORCID,Joseph Jeffrey IORCID,van Helmond NoudORCID

Abstract

Background New consumer health devices are being developed to easily monitor multiple physiological parameters on a regular basis. Many of these vital sign measurement devices have yet to be formally studied in a clinical setting but have already spread widely throughout the consumer market. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements of 2 novel all-in-one monitoring devices, the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor and the Everlast smartwatch. Methods We enrolled 127 patients (>18 years) from the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Preadmission Testing Center. SBP and HR were measured by both investigational devices. In addition, the Everlast watch was utilized to measure DBP, and the BodiMetrics Performance Monitor was utilized to measure SpO2. After 5 min of quiet sitting, four hospital-grade standard and three investigational vital sign measurements were taken, with 60 seconds in between each measurement. The reference vital sign measurements were calculated by determining the average of the two standard measurements that bounded each investigational measurement. Using this method, we determined three comparison pairs for each investigational device in each subject. After excluding data from 42 individuals because of excessive variation in sequential standard measurements per prespecified dropping rules, data from 85 subjects were used for final analysis. Results Of 85 participants, 36 (42%) were women, and the mean age was 53 (SD 21) years. The accuracy guidelines were only met for the HR measurements in both devices. SBP measurements deviated 16.9 (SD 13.5) mm Hg and 5.3 (SD 4.7) mm Hg from the reference values for the Everlast and BodiMetrics devices, respectively. The mean absolute difference in DBP measurements for the Everlast smartwatch was 8.3 (SD 6.1) mm Hg. The mean absolute difference between BodiMetrics and reference SpO2 measurements was 3.02%. Conclusions Both devices we investigated met accuracy guidelines for HR measurements, but they failed to meet the predefined accuracy guidelines for other vital sign measurements. Continued sale of consumer physiological monitors without prior validation and approval procedures is a public health concern.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference22 articles.

1. High-Definition Medicine

2. Digital “Snake Oil” or the Future of Healthcare?

3. Validation of the Instant Blood Pressure Smartphone App

4. RoddenberyGGoodreads2020-01-13Star Trek: The Original Serieshttps://www.goodreads.com/series/40416-star-trek-the-original-series

5. Datex-Ohmeda, IncBiomedical Manuals20070509Madison, WI, USAGeneral Electric CompanyDatex-Ohmeda Cardiocap™/5: Technical Reference Manualhttps://biomedicalmanuals.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CardioCap-5.pdf

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Smart Health Recommendation using Vitals;International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology;2024-02-06

2. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Blood Oxygen Saturation Measurement using Smart Watch Devices Among Pediatric Users in Saudi Arabia;2023 IEEE International Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Conference (IBITeC);2023-11-09

3. Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review;International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation;2023-10-02

4. Digital Platform for Continuous Monitoring of Patients Using a Smartwatch: Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study;JMIR Formative Research;2023-09-12

5. Investigating the accuracy of blood oxygen saturation measurements in common consumer smartwatches;PLOS Digital Health;2023-07-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3