Within-person structures of daily cognitive performance differ from between-person structures of cognitive abilities

Author:

Schmiedek Florian12,Lövdén Martin13,von Oertzen Timo14,Lindenberger Ulman156

Affiliation:

1. Center for Lifespan Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany

2. DIPF — Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

3. Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

4. Department of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, München, Germany

5. European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy

6. Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London & Berlin, United Kingdom & Germany

Abstract

Over a century of research on between-person differences has resulted in the consensus that human cognitive abilities are hierarchically organized, with a general factor, termed general intelligence or “g,” uppermost. Surprisingly, it is unknown whether this body of evidence is informative about how cognition is structured within individuals. Using data from 101 young adults performing nine cognitive tasks on 100 occasions distributed over six months, we find that the structures of individuals’ cognitive abilities vary among each other, and deviate greatly from the modal between-person structure. Working memory contributes the largest share of common variance to both between- and within-person structures, but the g factor is much less prominent within than between persons. We conclude that between-person structures of cognitive abilities cannot serve as a surrogate for within-person structures. To reveal the development and organization of human intelligence, individuals need to be studied over time.

Funder

Max Planck Society

Innovation Fund of the Max Planck Society

The Sofja Kovalevskaja Award of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

German Federal Ministry for Education and Research

German Research Foundation

DFG’s Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Award

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference61 articles.

1. Life span theory in developmental psychology;Baltes,2006

2. Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review;Batty;Annals of Epidemiology,2007

3. Issues in intraindividual variability: individual differences in equilibria and dynamics over multiple time scales;Boker;Psychology and Aging,2009

4. The theoretical status of latent variables;Borsboom;Psychological Review,2003

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3