Evaluation of methods for determining energy flexibility of buildings

Author:

Chantzis Georgios1,Antoniadou Panagiota1,Symeonidou Maria1,Kyriaki Elli1,Giama Effrosyni1,Oxyzidis Symeon1,Kolokotsa Dionysia2,Papadopoulos Agis M.1

Affiliation:

1. Process Equipment Design Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

2. Laboratory of Energy Management in the Built Environment, Division of Environmental Management, Technical University of Crete, GR 73100 Chania, Crete, Greece

Abstract

The high rate of penetration of renewable energy sources leads to challenges in planning and controlling the production, transmission and distribution of energy. A possible solution lies within the change from traditional supply side management to demand side management. Buildings are good candidates for implementing a demand response model since they account for around 39% of global final energy use and are stably connected to all infrastructure networks. As a result, employing buildings as "players" in energy networks is considered now more than ever compelling. Recently, significant improvement has been denoted in the thermal efficiency of the building shell and the energy efficiency of the HVAC systems in new and renovated buildings. However, despite the reduction in energy demand regarding the space conditioning, buildings continue to be passive end users of the energy system. In order to ensure that they are capable of providing the necessary energy flexibility to balance intermittent energy production, a first step is to establish a formal, standard, and robust method of characterizing the energy flexibility provided on the demand side. Buildings can supply flexibility in a variety of ways, but there is currently no fixed and consistent method for quantifying the amount of flexibility a building can provide to future energy systems. In this paper, an overview of the literature on building energy flexibility will be offered, as well as an introduction to the concept of building energy flexibility and the methodologies used to define and evaluate it.

Publisher

Pivot Science Publications Corporation

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Water Science and Technology,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Immunology,Clinical Biochemistry,Immunology,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Artificial Intelligence,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Software,Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Complementary and alternative medicine,Plant Science,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,General Medicine,Molecular Medicine

Reference70 articles.

1. Heylen E, Deconinck G, Van Hertem D. Review and classification of reliability indicators for power systems with a high share of renewable energy sources. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;97:554–568.

2. Jensen SØ, Marszal-Pomianowska A, Lollini R, Pasut W, Knotzer A, Engelmann P, et al. IEA EBC Annex 67 Energy Flexible Buildings. Energy Build. 2017 Nov 15;155:25–34.

3. Jordehi AR. Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019 Apr 1;103:308–319.

4. ENTSO-E. Towards smarter grids : Developing TSO and DSO roles and interactions for the benefit of consumers. Eur Netw Transm Syst Oper Electr. 2015;1–8.

5. IRENA. Co-Operation Between Transmission and Distribution System Operators Innovation Landscape Brief About Irena [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2021 Sep 23] Available from: www.irena.org.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3