The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution Types

Author:

Brancaccio-Taras Loretta1,Pape-Lindstrom Pamela2,Peteroy-Kelly Marcy3,Aguirre Karen4,Awong-Taylor Judy5,Balser Teri6,Cahill Michael J.7,Frey Regina F.7,Jack Thomas8,Kelrick Michael9,Marley Kate10,Miller Kathryn G.11,Osgood Marcy12,Romano Sandra13,Uzman J. Akif14,Zhao Jiuqing7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences, Kingsborough Community College–CUNY, Brooklyn, NY 11235

2. Life Sciences Department, Everett Community College, Everett, WA 98201

3. Department of Biology, Pace University, New York, NY 10038

4. Department of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29528

5. Department of Biology, Georgia Gwinnett College, Lawrenceville, GA 30043

6. Curtin University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia

7. Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education (CIRCLE) and

8. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755

9. Department of Biology, Truman State University, Kirksville, MO 63501

10. Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs, Doane College, Crete, NE 68333

11. Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130

12. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131

13. College of Science and Mathematics, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, VI 00802

14. College of Sciences and Technology, University of Houston–Downtown, Houston, TX 77002

Abstract

The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, assess life sciences departments’ progress toward implementation of the principles of the Vision and Change report. This paper reports on the development of the rubrics, their validation, and their reliability in measuring departmental change aligned with the Vision and Change recommendations. The rubrics assess 66 different criteria across five areas: Curriculum Alignment, Assessment, Faculty Practice/Faculty Support, Infrastructure, and Climate for Change. The results from this work demonstrate the rubrics can be used to evaluate departmental transformation equitably across institution types and represent baseline data about the adoption of the Vision and Change recommendations by life sciences programs across the United States. While all institution types have made progress, liberal arts institutions are farther along in implementing these recommendations. Generally, institutions earned the highest scores on the Curriculum Alignment rubric and the lowest scores on the Assessment rubric. The results of this study clearly indicate that the Vision & Change Rubrics, version 1.0, are valid and equitable and can track long-term progress of the transformation of life sciences departments. In addition, four of the five rubrics have broad applicability and can be used to evaluate departmental transformation by other science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines.

Publisher

American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Education

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3