An Object-Based Approach for Quantification of GCM Biases of the Simulation of Orographic Precipitation. Part II: Quantitative Analysis

Author:

Yorgun M. Soner1,Rood Richard B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Abstract

Abstract An object-based evaluation method is applied to the simulated orographic precipitation for the idealized experimental setups using the National Center of Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) with the finite volume (FV) and Eulerian spectral transform dynamical cores with varying resolutions. The method consists of the application of k-means cluster analysis to the precipitation features to determine their spatial boundaries and the calculation of the semivariograms (SVs) for the isolated features for evaluation. The quantitative analysis revealed differences between the simulated precipitation by the FV and Eulerian spectral transform models that are not visually apparent. The simulated large-scale precipitation features of the idealized test cases provide analogs to orographic precipitation features observed in simulations of Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) models. The spatial boundaries of these features (determined by k-means clustering) for Eulerian spectral T85 and T170 resolutions revealed the level of merger between the two large-scale features simulated because of each peak in the double mountain idealized setup. Both FV 1° and 0.5° resolutions were able to simulate the dryer region between the two mountains. The SVs of precipitation for the single and double mountain setups show close agreement between FV 1°, FV 0.5°, and Eulerian spectral T170 resolutions; however, Eulerian spectral T85 simulated the precipitation in lower intensity, indicating the qualitative difference in resolutions previously determined to be equivalent. Such close agreement was not observed in the more realistic idealized setup.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3