Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft

Author:

Redfors Björn1,Généreux Philippe1,Witzenbichler Bernhard1,McAndrew Thomas1,Diamond Jamie1,Huang Xin1,Maehara Akiko1,Weisz Giora1,Mehran Roxana1,Kirtane Ajay J.1,Stone Gregg W.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY (B.R., P.G., T.M., X.H., A.M., G.W., R.M., A.J.K., G.W.S.); Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Division of Cardiology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center (J.D., A.M., G.W., A.J.K., G.W.S.); Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, NJ (P.G.); Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada (P.G.); Department of Cardiology and Pneumology...

Abstract

Background— Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) has historically been associated with a high risk of adverse ischemic events, but there is a paucity of contemporary data on the second-generation drug-eluting stent use within SVG, and the relative importance of high platelet reactivity (HPR) in SVG PCI versus native lesion PCI is unknown. We studied ischemic and bleeding events after SVG PCI and their association with HPR. Methods and Results— Subjects in the prospective, multicenter ADAPT-DES study (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents) were stratified according to whether they had PCI of an SVG or a non-SVG lesion. Two-year outcomes were compared between groups using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. HPR was defined as on-clopidogrel P2Y12 platelet reaction units >208 as measured by the VerifyNow assay; major adverse cardiac events were defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. Among 8582 subjects in ADAPT-DES, 405 (4.7%) had SVG PCI. SVG PCI was independently associated with a higher 2-year risk of major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.69–3.23; P <0.0001), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–2.42; P <0.0001), and stent thrombosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–3.59; P =0.0006), but not of bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.68–1.46; P =0.97). There was no statistical interaction between HPR and SVG PCI in regard to major adverse cardiac events (adjusted P interaction =0.99). Conclusions— SVG PCI is associated with a considerably higher risk of 2-year adverse ischemic events, with HPR conferring similar risk in SVG and non-SVG PCI. More potent and longer antiplatelet therapy may be beneficial for patients undergoing SVG PCI. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00638794.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3