Final 3-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing a Self-Expanding to a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Author:

Lanz Jonas1ORCID,Möllmann Helge2,Kim Won-Keun3ORCID,Burgdorf Christof4,Linke Axel56,Redwood Simon7ORCID,Hilker Michael8,Joner Michael9ORCID,Thiele Holger10ORCID,Conzelmann Lars11ORCID,Conradi Lenard12ORCID,Kerber Sebastian13,Thilo Christian14,Toggweiler Stefan15ORCID,Prendergast Bernard7,Husser Oliver16,Stortecky Stefan1ORCID,Deckarm Sarah6,Künzi ArnaudORCID,Heg Dik6ORCID,Walther Thomas17ORCID,Windecker Stephan1ORCID,Pilgrim Thomas1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland (J.L., S.S., S.W., T.P.).

2. Department of Internal Medicine I, St-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany (H.M.).

3. Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (W.-K.K.).

4. Heart and Vascular Center, Bad Bevensen, Germany (C.B.).

5. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany (A.L.).

6. Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland (S.D., A.K., D.H.).

7. Department of Cardiology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom (S.R., B.P.).

8. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany (M.H.).

9. German Heart Centre, Technical University of Munich, Germany (M.J.).

10. Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Germany (H.T.).

11. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Helios Klinik, Karlsruhe, Germany (L. Conzelmann).

12. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Germany (L. Conradi).

13. Department of Cardiology, Cardio-vascular Center Bad Neustadt, Germany (S.K.).

14. Department of Internal Medicine I, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Germany (C.T.).

15. Heart Center Lucerne, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland (S.T.).

16. Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Augustinum Klinik Munich (O.H.).

17. Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany (T.W.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the SCOPE I trial (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis), transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo (NEO) did not meet noninferiority compared with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) device regarding a composite end point at 30 days due to higher rates of prosthetic valve regurgitation and acute kidney injury. Data on long-term durability of NEO are scarce. Here, we report whether early differences between NEO and S3 translate into differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with NEO or S3 at 20 European centers. Clinical outcomes at 3 years are compared using Cox proportional or Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models by intention-to-treat. Bioprosthetic valve failure is reported for the valve-implant cohort. RESULTS: Among 739 patients, 84 of 372 patients (24.3%) had died in the NEO and 85 of 367 (25%) in the S3 group at 3 years. Comparing NEO with S3, the 3-year rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73–1.33]), stroke (subhazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.56–1.92]), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (subhazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.51–1.07]) were similar between the groups. Aortic valve reinterventions were required in 4 NEO and 3 S3 patients (subhazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.30–5.85]). New York Heart Association functional class ≤II was observed in 84% (NEO) and 85% (S3), respectively. Mean gradients remained lower after NEO at 3 years (8 versus 12 mm Hg; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early differences between NEO and S3 did not translate into significant differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure throughout 3 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov , Unique identifier: NCT03011346.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3