Role of Dietary Fats in Modulating Cardiometabolic Risk During Moderate Weight Gain: A Randomized Double‐Blind Overfeeding Trial (LIPOGAIN Study)

Author:

Iggman David12,Rosqvist Fredrik1,Larsson Anders3,Ärnlöv Johan45,Beckman Lena678,Rudling Mats678,Risérus Ulf1

Affiliation:

1. Unit for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

2. Center for Clinical Research Dalarna, Falun, Sweden

3. Section of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

4. Department of Medical Sciences, Molecular Epidemiology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

5. School of Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden

6. Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

7. Molecular Nutrition Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

8. Center for Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Background Whether the type of dietary fat could alter cardiometabolic responses to a hypercaloric diet is unknown. In addition, subclinical cardiometabolic consequences of moderate weight gain require further study. Methods and Results In a 7‐week, double‐blind, parallel‐group, randomized controlled trial, 39 healthy, lean individuals (mean age of 27±4) consumed muffins (51% of energy [%E] from fat and 44%E refined carbohydrates) providing 750 kcal/day added to their habitual diets. All muffins had identical contents, except for type of fat; sunflower oil rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids ( PUFA diet) or palm oil rich in saturated fatty acids ( SFA diet). Despite comparable weight gain in the 2 groups, total: high‐density lipoprotein ( HDL ) cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein: HDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B: AI ratios decreased during the PUFA versus the SFA diet (−0.37±0.59 versus +0.07±0.29, −0.31±0.49 versus +0.05±0.28, and −0.07±0.11 versus +0.01±0.07, P =0.003, P =0.007, and P =0.01 for between‐group differences), whereas no significant differences were observed for other cardiometabolic risk markers. In the whole group (ie, independently of fat type), body weight increased (+2.2%, P <0.001) together with increased plasma proinsulin (+21%, P =0.007), insulin (+17%, P =0.003), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, (+9%, P =0.008) fibroblast growth factor‐21 (+31%, P =0.04), endothelial markers vascular cell adhesion molecule–1, intercellular adhesion molecule–1, and E‐selectin (+9, +5, and +10%, respectively, P <0.01 for all), whereas nonesterified fatty acids decreased (−28%, P =0.001). Conclusions Excess energy from PUFA versus SFA reduces atherogenic lipoproteins. Modest weight gain in young individuals induces hyperproinsulinemia and increases biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, effects that may be partly outweighed by the lipid‐lowering effects of PUFA . Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://ClinicalTrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01427140.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3