Utilization of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapies in the United States and Canada

Author:

Cram Peter1234,Girotra Saket56,Matelski John3,Koh Maria4,Landon Bruce E.7,Han Lu4,Lee Douglas S.1849,Ko Dennis T.1410

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine (P.C., D.S.L., D.T.K.), University of Toronto, ON.

2. North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (P.C.), University of Toronto, ON.

3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON (P.C., J.M.).

4. ICES, Toronto, ON (P.C., M.K., L.H., D.S.L., D.T.K.).

5. Department of Medicine, University of Iowa (S.G.).

6. Comprehensive Access Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center (S.G.).

7. Division of General Medicine, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA (B.L.).

8. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (D.S.L.), University of Toronto, ON.

9. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, ON (D.S.L.).

10. Division of Cardiology, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON (D.T.K.).

Abstract

Background: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are expensive cardiovascular technologies with potential to benefit large numbers of patients. There are few population-based studies comparing utilization between countries. Our objective was to compare patient characteristics and utilization patterns of EVAR, LVAD, and TAVR in Ontario, Canada, and New York State, United States. Methods and Results: We performed a retrospective cohort study using administrative data to identify all adults who received EVAR, LVAD, or TAVR in Ontario and New York between 2012 and 2015. We compared socio-demographics of EVAR, LVAD, and TAVR recipients in Ontario and New York. We compared standardized utilization rates between jurisdictions for each procedure. We identified 3295 EVAR recipients from Ontario and 6236 from New York (mean age 74.6 versus 74.5 years; P =0.61): 136 LVAD recipients from Ontario and 686 from New York (age, 57.4 versus 57.7 years; P =0.80): 1708 TAVR recipients from Ontario and 4838 from New York (age, 83.1 versus 83.1; P =1.0). A significantly smaller percentage of EVAR and TAVR recipients in Ontario were female compared to New York (EVAR, 15.8% versus 22.1% female; P <0.001; TAVR, 45.9% versus 51.8%; P <0.001), but for LVAD the percentage female was similar (21.3% versus 20.8%; P =0.99). Utilization was significantly higher in New York for all procedures: EVAR (12.8 procedures per-100 000 adults per-year in Ontario, 20.2 in New York; P <0.001); LVAD (0.3 in Ontario versus 1.3 in New York; P <0.001); and TAVR (6.6 in Ontario, 14.3 in New York; P <0.001). Higher utilization of EVAR and TAVR in New York relative to Ontario increased substantially with increasing age. Conclusions: We observed significantly higher utilization of EVAR, LVAD, and TAVR in New York compared to Ontario. Our results highlight important differences in how 2 different countries are using advanced cardiovascular therapies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3