Emergency department utilization, admissions, and revisits in the United States (New York), Canada (Ontario), and New Zealand: A retrospective cross‐sectional analysis

Author:

Duffy Juliana1,Jones Peter23ORCID,McNaughton Candace D.145,Ling Vicki4,Matelski John5,Hsia Renee Y.67ORCID,Landon Bruce E.89,Cram Peter410ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

3. Adult Emergency Department Auckland City Hospital Auckland New Zealand

4. ICES (formerly known as the Institute for Comparative and Evaluative Sciences) Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Biostatistics Research Unit Toronto General Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Department of Emergency Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

7. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy UCSF San Francisco California USA

8. Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Division of General Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

10. Department of Internal Medicine UTMB Galveston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEmergency department (ED) utilization is a significant concern in many countries, but few population‐based studies have compared ED use. Our objective was to compare ED utilization in New York (United States), Ontario (Canada), and New Zealand (NZ).MethodsA retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of all ED visits between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017, for adults ≥18 years using data from the State Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases (New York), the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System and Discharge Abstract Data (Ontario), and the National Non‐Admitted Patient Collection and the National Minimum Data Set (New Zealand). Outcomes included age‐ and sex‐standardized per‐capita ED utilization (overall and stratified by neighborhood income), ED disposition, and ED revisit and hospitalization within 30 days of ED discharge.ResultsThere were 10,998,371 ED visits in New York, 8,754,751 in Ontario, and 1,547,801 in New Zealand. Patients were older in Ontario (mean age 51.1 years) compared to New Zealand (50.3) and New York (48.7). Annual sex‐ and age‐standardized per‐capita ED utilization was higher in Ontario than New York or New Zealand (443.2 vs. 404.0 or 248.4 visits per 1000 population/year, respectively). In all countries, ED utilization was highest for residents of the lowest income quintile neighborhoods. The proportion of ED visits resulting in hospitalization was higher in New Zealand (34.5%) compared to New York (20.8%) and Ontario (12.8%). Thirty‐day ED revisits were higher in Ontario (27.0%) than New Zealand (18.6%) or New York (21.4%).ConclusionsPatterns of ED utilization differed widely across three high‐income countries. These differences highlight the varying approaches that our countries take with respect to urgent visits, suggest opportunities for shared learning through international comparisons, and raise important questions about optimal approaches for all countries.

Funder

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3