Variation in care for patients presenting with hip fracture in six high‐income countries: A cross‐sectional cohort study

Author:

Burrack Nitzan1ORCID,Hatfield Laura A.2ORCID,Bakx Pieter3,Banerjee Amitava45,Chen Yu‐Chin6,Fu Christina2,Godoy Junior Carlos3,Gordon Michal1,Heine Renaud3,Huang Nicole6ORCID,Ko Dennis T.789,Lix Lisa M.1011,Novack Victor1,Pasea Laura4,Qiu Feng8,Stukel Therese A.812,Uyl‐de Groot Carin3,Ravi Bheeshma1314,Al‐Azazi Saeed1011,Weinreb Gabe2,Cram Peter91215ORCID,Landon Bruce E.216

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, and Faculty of Health Sciences Ben Gurion University of the Negev Beersheba Israel

2. Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management Erasmus University Rotterdam the Netherlands

4. Institute of Health Informatics University College London London UK

5. Department of Cardiology University College London Hospitals London UK

6. Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei Taiwan

7. Schulich Heart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto Canada

8. ICES Toronto Canada

9. Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Canada

10. Department of Community Health Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Canada

11. George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation University of Manitoba Winnipeg Canada

12. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Canada

13. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Canada

14. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Canada

15. Department of Medicine UTMB Galveston Texas USA

16. Division of General Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHip fractures are costly and common in older adults, but there is limited understanding of how treatment patterns and outcomes might differ between countries.MethodsWe performed a retrospective serial cross‐sectional cohort study of adults aged ≥66 years hospitalized with hip fracture between 2011 and 2018 in the US, Canada, England, the Netherlands, Taiwan, and Israel using population‐representative administrative data. We examined mortality, hip fracture treatment approaches (total hip arthroplasty [THA], hemiarthroplasty [HA], internal fixation [IF], and nonoperative), and health system performance measures, including hospital length of stay (LOS), 30‐day readmission rates, and time‐to‐surgery.ResultsThe total number of hip fracture admissions between 2011 and 2018 ranged from 23,941 in Israel to 1,219,696 in the US. In 2018, 30‐day mortality varied from 3% (16% at 1 year) in Taiwan to 10% (27%) in the Netherlands. With regards to processes of care, the proportion of hip fractures treated with HA (range 23%–45%) and THA (0.2%–10%) differed widely across countries. For example, in 2018, THA was used to treat approximately 9% of patients in England and Israel but less than 1% in Taiwan. Overall, IF was the most common surgery performed in all countries (40%–60% of patients). IF was used in approximately 60% of patients in the US and Israel, but only 40% in England. In 2018, rates of nonoperative management ranged from 5% of patients in Taiwan to nearly 10% in England. Mean hospital LOS in 2018 ranged from 6.4 days (US) to 18.7 days (England). The 30‐day readmission rate in 2018 ranged from 8% (in Canada and the Netherlands) to nearly 18% in England. The mean days to surgery in 2018 ranged from 0.5 days (Israel) to 1.6 days (Canada).ConclusionsWe observed substantial between‐country variation in mortality, surgical approaches, and health system performance measures. These findings underscore the need for further research to inform evidence‐based surgical approaches.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3