Affiliation:
1. Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia
Abstract
We consider intellectual activity results (IAR) of scientific organizations in the context of intellectual property protection and as one of the indicators of their effectiveness. The data characterizing Russia’s place in the world rankings in terms of the number of patent applications and the number of applications per 1 million people are presented, and a conclusion is made about the relatively low activity in protecting IAR in comparison with the leaders of the ratings. The authors have conducted an analysis of normative legal acts (NLA) on the consolidation and transfer of rights to IAR, as well as NLA that characterize IAR in terms of the effectiveness of research activity, as well as of the certification of researchers. It is concluded that the current system of NLA does not impede or discourage the work of scientific organizations with IAR. It is shown that NLA related to the evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific institutions should also stimulate their active work with IAR. At the same time, the available statistical data on the share of research organizations in patent applications filed and licenses sold indicate that their activity in promoting IAR in the real sector of the economy is on average more than twice lower than in Russia as a whole. It is assumed that the evolving situation regarding working with IAR is determined by economic factors. We have outlined ways for further research on factors that can significantly affect the activity of scientific organizations in working with the promotion of IAR, in particular, to assess the potential demand for IAR and the prospective value of IAR from the points of view of the seller and the buyer.
Publisher
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
Reference15 articles.
1. Shepelev G. V. On the evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific research. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021;3(4):123–145. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.15.
2. Shepelev G. V. Requirements for the Russian publications system under sanctions pressure. Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(3):105–128. (In Russ.). DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.8.
3. Facts and figures. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). February 2022. Available at: https://wipo.int/edocs/infogdocs/en/ipfactsandfigures/ (accessed: 11.01.2024).
4. Arsentiev M. V., Dezhina I. G., Klyucharev G. A. [et al.]. Knowledge-intensive industries in the system of interaction of institutions [Naukoemkie proizvodstva v sisteme vzaimodeistviya institutov] : Monograph. Moscow : FCTAS RAS; 2021. 352 p. (In Russ.). ISBN 978-5-89697-334-8.
5. Methodic recommendations for the regions on the commercialization of IP assets [Metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya regionov po kommertsializatsii RID] / comp. by S. Yu. Ulyashina. Moscow : The Federal Institute of Industrial Property (FIPS); 2021. 43 p. (In Russ.).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献