On Expert Evaluation of the Scientific Research Effectiveness

Author:

Shepelev Gennady1

Affiliation:

1. Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”, Kemerovo, Russia

Abstract

The general approaches to expertise in assessing the effectiveness of the scientific and technical sphere are considered. The roles of the participants of the examination – the decision-maker, the organizer of the examination, experts, and other interested participants in the results of the examination are considered. The general requirements for experts, such as qualification, objectivity, independence of the expert, possible conflicts of interests of the participants of the examination, are analyzed. The implementation of the theoretical provisions of the organization of expertise on practical examples is considered. It is shown that expert assessments in the analysis of the effectiveness of scientific organizations can lead to unreliable results, as well as the use of scientometric performance indicators outside the zone of their applicability.Some basic scientometric indicators are considered, it is shown that they can be considered as formalized answers to examination questions. The dependence of scientometric indicators on the scale of the audience to which certain publications are published is shown. Possible changes in the scientometric indicators of Russian publications are predicted in conditions of limited access of Russian publications to world information systems.

Publisher

Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Shepelev, G. V. (2022). Requirements for the Russian publications system under sanctions pressure. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.8 (In Russ.).

2. Shepelev, G. V. (2021). On the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Scientific Research. Science Management: Theory and Practice. Vol. 3, no. 4. Р. 123–145. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.15 (In Russ.).

3. Shepelev, G. V. (2020). On the governance of Russian science. Science management: theory and practice. Vol. 2, no. 2. P. 65–92. DOI 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.2.3 (In Russ.).

4. Lazarenko, N. E. (2003). Formirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoi ekspertizy v nauchno-tekhnicheskoi sfere [Formation of the system of state expertise in the scientific and technical sphere]. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.05. RANEPA. Moscow. (In Russ.).

5. Zelentsova, N. I., Petrov, A. N., Tuzova, S. Yu. and Garina, S. M. (2017). About expertise for state granting in the framework of the Federal Target Program «Research and development on priority directions of scientific-technological complex of Russia for 2014-2020». Innovations. No. 2 (220). P. 86–92. (In Russ.).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3