Affiliation:
1. Universitas Kristen Maranatha
2. University of Otago
3. University of Tasmania
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study modifies a popular business simulation game, Monopoly, to assess its effectiveness as a learning and teaching tool for helping high school accounting students acquire and apply foundational accounting concepts. The study compares an accounting-focused, Modified Monopoly simulation game with two other instructional methods. Using a quasi-experimental approach that involves three learning groups with random assignment of treatments based on school/class, a sample of 144 accounting students was obtained. This study found students using Modified Monopoly showed significantly greater improvement between their pre- and post-test scores than students in Computer-assisted instruction (CAI), but significantly less improvement than a paper-based extended accounting problem (EAP). However, students using Modified Monopoly, similar to CAI students, did not suffer the same significant decay in knowledge as students in EAP. These results offer evidence for the significant and more enduring learning benefits that Modified Monopoly can produce in students' higher-order thinking skills.
Data Availability: Data are available upon request.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference129 articles.
1. Abhayawansa,
S.,
and
FonsecaL.
2010.
Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning—A phenomenographic study of a group of overseas accounting students from Sri Lanka.
Accounting Education19 (
5):
527–
550.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2010.502651
2. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC).
1990.
Objectives of education for accountants: Position Statement Number One.
Issues in Accounting Education (
5):
307–
312.
3. Accounting Education Change Commission (AECC).
1992.
The first course in accounting: Position statement No. 2.
Issues in Accounting Education7 (
2):
249–
251.
4. Adams,
D. M.,
Mayer
R. E.,
MacNamara
A.,
Koenig
A.,
and
WainessR.
2012.
Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses.
Journal of Educational Psychology104 (
1):
235–
249.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025595
5. Adams,
L. T.,
Kasserman
J. E.,
Yearwood
A. A.,
Perfetto
G. A.,
Bransford
J. D.,
and
FranksJ. J.
1988.
Memory access: The effects of fact-oriented versus problem-oriented acquisition.
Memory & Cognition16 (
2):
167–
175.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213486
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献