Affiliation:
1. Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine
2. Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052
3. Microbiological Diagnostic Unit, Public Health Laboratory
4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Due to the early administration of antibiotics, meningococcal disease is increasingly difficult to diagnose by culturing. Laboratory studies have shown PCR to be sensitive and specific, but there have been few clinical studies. The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of meningococcal PCR through a prospective comparison of real-time PCR, nested PCR, and standard culturing of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The setting was a tertiary-care pediatric hospital in Australia, and the participans were 118 children admitted with possible septicemia or meningitis. The main outcome measures—sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values—were compared to a “gold standard ” fulfilling clinical and laboratory criteria. For 24 cases of meningococcal disease diagnosed by the gold standard, culturing of blood or CSF was positive for 15 (63%), nested PCR was positive for 21 (88%), and real-time PCR was positive for 23 (96%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of real-time PCR (the most sensitive test) for all specimens were, respectively, 96% (95% confidence interval, 79 to 99%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 96 to100%), 100% (95% confidence interval, 85 to 100%), and 99% (95% confidence interval, 94 to 100%). Of 54 patients with suspected meningococcal disease at admission, 23 had positive PCR results. Only one PCR specimen was positive in a patient thought unlikely to have meningococcal disease at admission. Blood PCR remained positive for 33% of patients tested at up to 72 h. Real-time PCR has high positive and negative predictive values in this clinical setting, with better confirmation of cases than nested PCR. Targeting patients for PCR based on admission criteria appears to be practical, and the test may remain useful for several days after the start of antibiotic administration.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference32 articles.
1. al Wali, W., and C. Hughes. 1998. Urine antigen detection can be quicker than PCR in the diagnosis of meningococcal disease. J. Hosp. Infect.40:326-328.
2. Anonymous. 2001. Guidelines for the early clinical and public health management of meningococcal disease in Australia p. 8. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care Canberra Australia.
3. Nonculture Prediction of
Neisseria meningitidis
Susceptibility to Penicillin
4. Bohr, V., N. Rasmussen, B. Hansen, H. Kjersem, O. Jessen, N. Johnsen, and H. S. Kristensen. 1983. 875 cases of bacterial meningitis: diagnostic procedures and the impact of preadmission antibiotic therapy. Part III of a three-part series. J. Infect.7:193-202.
5. Borrow, R., H. Claus, M. Guiver, L. Smart, D. M. Jones, E. B. Kaczmarski, M. Frosch, and A. J. Fox. 1997. Non-culture diagnosis and serogroup determination of meningococcal B and C infection by a sialyltransferase (siaD) PCR ELISA. Epidemiol. Infect.118:111-117.
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献