Abstract
Aim of study: The concentration of phenolics in the grape berries can be influenced by cultural practices such as irrigation or thinning. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of combinations of these practices on grape size and phenolics content. Area of study: The trial was carried out in an experimental cv. Tempranillo vineyard located in Extremadura, Spain. Material and methods: Two irrigation regimes were considered: rainfed vines (non-irrigated, NIr), and 100% ETc irrigated vines (Ir). For each irrigation treatment, two cropping levels were studied: low shoot-thinning (LT) vs high shoot-thinning (HT) implemented in winter and spring, respectively. Berry weight, and total phenolics, proanthocyanidin, and anthocyanin concentrations were determined at eight stages of berry development in three consecutive years (2014, 2015, and 2016). Main results: Specific weather conditions of each year affected phenolics accumulation differently. In 2014, where maximum temperatures were low and an important rainfall occurred at Stage II, both the NIr-LT and NIr-HT treatments led to the greatest concentrations of total phenolics, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins. In 2015, where a little rainfall was registered at Stage II, the berries from the NIr-HT and Ir-HT treatments accumulated the greatest total phenolics and proanthocyanidin contents, but the NIr-LT and NIr-HT treatments led to the greatest accumulation of anthocyanins. Finally, in 2016, where high maximum temperatures and scarce rainfall were registered, the Ir-LT and Ir-HT treatments presented the greatest concentrations of total phenolics, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins. Research highlights: A significant effect of irrigation and thinning was observed on berry size and phenolic content, as well as year × thinning interaction.
Publisher
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference57 articles.
1. Adams DO, 2006. Phenolics and ripening in grape berries. Am J Enol Vitic 57: 249-256.
2. Basile B, Marsal J, Mata M, Vallverdú X, Bellvert J, Girona J, 2011. Phenological sensitivity of Cabernet Sauvignon to water stress: Vine physiology and berry composition. Am J Enol Vitic 62: 452-461.
3. Bergqvist J, Dokoozlian N, Ebisuda N, 2001. Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet sauvignon and Grenache in the central San Joaquin valley of California. Am J Enol Vitic 52 (1): 1-7.
4. Bindon K, Varela C, Kennedy J, Holt H, Herderich M, 2013. Relationships between harvest time and wine composition in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon 1. Grape and wine chemistry. Food Chem 138: 1696-1705.
5. Boss PK, Davies C, 2009. Molecular biology of anthocyanin accumulation in grape berries, in grapevine molecular physiology & biotechnology; Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed). Springer, Dordrecht, pp: 263-292.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献