Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to reveal the nature of working in the field of hospitality by examining employment forms and working conditions. For this purpose, the phenomenology approach was used and interviews were conducted with 32 hotel employees. According to the findings, it has been seen that temporary and precarious forms of employment are common in tourism. It is seen that the employees are kept under strict control for efficiency and productivity and the managerial hegemony is at a significant level. In addition, it has been determined that due to standardization and simplification in hotel businesses with an all-inclusive system, employees are deprived of their qualifications and become unqualified.
Reference60 articles.
1. Abubakar, A. M., Anasori, E., & Lasisi, T. T. (2019). Physical attractiveness and managerial favoritism in the hotel industry: The light and dark side of erotic capital. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 38, 16-26.
2. Abubakar, A. M., Namin, B. H., Harazneh, I., Arasli, H., & Tunç, T. (2017). Does gender moderates the relationship between favoritism/nepotism, supervisor incivility, cynicism and workplace withdrawal: A neural network and SEM approach. Tourism Management Perspectives, 23, 129-139.
3. Aykac, A. (2010). Tourism employment: Towards an integrated policy approach. Anatolia, 21(1), 11–27.
4. Balcı İzgi, B. & Olcay, A. (2008). Çalışma koşullarının önemi: Gaziantep ilindeki 4 ve 5 yıldızlı otel işletmesi çalışanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 43-62.
5. Baum, T. (1993). Human resource concerns in European tourism: Strategic response and the EC. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 12(1), 77–88.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Digital nomadism and the tourism industry labor markets;Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes;2024-04-19