The Effect of the Wording of Multiple Documents on Learning

Author:

Schoor Cornelia1,Melzner Nadine12,Artelt Cordula13

Affiliation:

1. University of Bamberg

2. University of Augsburg

3. Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories Bamberg

Abstract

Abstract. Learning from multiple documents is challenging, amongst other things, because authors often do not use the same words for the same concept. Derived from theoretical considerations and earlier research, it was assumed that different wording across multiple documents leads to higher cognitive load but can be beneficial for the learning of highly motivated students. In the present study, N = 100 university students (laypersons with regard to the topic) took part. They read two texts on the topic of depression either with the same wording or with different wording and worked on a case study. Prior knowledge, epistemic beliefs, cognitive load, motivational state during learning, and post learning knowledge were assessed. While controlling for prior knowledge, a significant interaction effect was found from wording and motivational state on post knowledge about concepts. Different wording was beneficial only for students with relatively high motivation. However, wording had no effect on cognitive load.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference84 articles.

1. The functions of multiple representations

2. DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations

3. Barzilai, S. & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Individual differences in multiple document comprehension. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 99 – 116). New York: Routledge.

4. Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: ­Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56 – 64). New York, NY, US: Worth Publishers.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3