The Precision of in vitro Methods and Algorithms for Predicting the Bioavailability of Dietary Iron

Author:

Lynch Sean1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Clinical Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School

Abstract

Three factors determine how much iron will be absorbed from a meal. They are the physiological mechanisms that regulate uptake by and transfer through the enterocytes in the upper small intestine, the quantity of iron in the meal, and its availability to the cellular iron transporters. Established methods exist for predicting the effect of physiological regulation and for measuring or estimating meal iron content. Three approaches to estimating bioavailability have been advocated. Two are in vitro screening procedures: measurement of dialyzable iron and Caco-2 cell uptake, both carried out after in vitro simulated gastric and pancreatic digestion. The third is the use of algorithms based on the predicted effects of specific meal components on absorption derived from isotopic studies in human volunteers. The in vitro procedures have been very useful for identifying and characterizing factors that affect non-heme iron absorption, but direct comparisons between absorption predicted from the in vitro tests and measurements in human volunteers have only been made in a limited number of published studies. The available data indicate that dialysis and Caco-2 cell uptake are useful for ranking meals and single food items in terms of predicted iron bioavailability, but may not reflect the magnitudes of the effects of factors that influence absorption accurately. Algorithms based on estimates of the amounts of heme iron and of enhancers and inhibitors of non-heme iron absorption in foods make it possible to classify meals or diets as being of high, medium, or low bioavailability. The precision with which meal iron bioavailability can be predicted in a population, for which a specific algorithm has been developed, is improved by measuring the content of the most important enhancers and inhibitors. However, the accuracy of such predictions appears to be much lower when the algorithm is applied to meals eaten by different populations.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3