Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
2. Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratories, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Monitoring and maintenance of water quality in dump tanks or flume systems is crucial to maintaining proper sanitizer levels to prevent pathogen cross-contamination during postharvest washing of tomatoes, but there is limited information on how organic matter influences sanitizer efficacy in the water. The main objective of this study was to monitor water quality in flume tanks and evaluate the efficacy of postharvest washing of tomatoes in commercial packinghouses. Flume tank water samples (n = 3) were collected on an hourly basis from three packinghouses in Florida and analyzed for pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), free chlorine, chemical oxygen demand (COD), oxidation-reduction potential, and turbidity. Additionally, three flume-water samples were collected and tested for total aerobic plate count (APC), total coliforms (TC), and Escherichia coli. Fresh tomatoes (n = 3), both before and after washing, were collected and analyzed for the same bacterial counts. Turbidity, COD, and TDS levels in flume water increased over time in all packinghouses. Correlations observed include COD and turbidity (r = 0.631), turbidity and TDS (r = 0.810), and oxidation-reduction potential and chlorine (r = 0.660). APC for water samples had an average range of 0.0 to 4.7 log CFU/mL and TC average range of 0.0 to 4.7 log CFU/mL. All water samples were negative for E. coli. The average APC for pre- and postflume tomatoes from the three packinghouses was 6.0 log CFU per tomato and ranged from 2.2 to 7.4 log CFU per tomato. The average TC count was <1.5 and 7.0 log CFU per tomato for pre- and postwash tomatoes, respectively. There was no significant effect (P > 0.05) of postharvest washing on the microbiological qualities of tomatoes. Water quality in flume tanks deteriorated over time in all packinghouses during a typical operational day of 4 to 8 h.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference25 articles.
1. Bornhorst,
E. R.,
Luo
Y.,
Park
E.,
Vinyard
B. T.,
Nou
X.,
Zhou
B.,
Turner
E.,
and
MillnerP. D.
2018.
Immersion-free, single-pass, commercial fresh-cut produce washing system: an alternative to flume processing.
Postharvest Biol. Technol.
146:
124–
133.
2. Castro-Rosas,
J.,
Lopez
E. M. S.,
Gomez-Aldapa
C. A.,
Ramirez
C. A. G.,
Villagomez-Ibarra
J. R.,
Gordillo-Martinez
A. J.,
Lopez
A. V.,
and
del Refugio Torres-VitelaM.
2010.
Incidence and behavior of Salmonella and Escherichia coli on whole and sliced zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo) fruit.
J. Food Prot.
73:
1423–
1429.
3. De,
J.,
Li
Y.,
Sreedharan
A.,
Goodrich Schneider
R.,
Gutierrez
A.,
Jubair
M.,
Danyluk
M. D.,
and
SchneiderK. R.
2018.
A three-year survey of Florida packinghouses to determine microbial loads on pre- and post-processed tomatoes.
Food Control86:
383–
388.
4. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
2018.
Tomato best practices manual: a guide to tomato good agricultural practices and tomato best management practices.
Available at: https://fvreports.fdacs.gov/5G_TomBPM.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2021.
5. Gereffi,
S.,
Sreedharan
A.,
and
SchneiderK. R.
2015.
Control of Salmonella cross-contamination between green round tomatoes in a model flume system.
J. Food Prot.
78:
1280–
1287.