Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The process of washing tomatoes in dump (flume) tanks has been identified as a potential source of cross-contamination. This study's objective was to assess the potential for Salmonella enterica cross-contamination at various inoculation levels in the presence of free chlorine (HOCl) and organic matter. Uninoculated tomatoes were introduced into a laboratory-based model flume containing tomatoes inoculated with a cocktail of five rifampin-resistant S. enterica serovars at 104, 106, or 108 CFU per tomato in water containing 0 or 25 mg/L HOCl and 0 or 300 mg/L chemical oxygen demand (COD). Uninoculated tomatoes exposed to the inoculated tomatoes were removed from the water after 5, 30, 60, and 120 s and placed in bags containing tryptic soy broth supplemented with rifampin and 0.1% sodium thiosulfate. Following incubation, enrichment cultures were plated on tryptic soy agar supplemented with rifampin and xylose lysine deoxycholate agar to determine the presence of Salmonella. HOCl and pH were measured before and after each trial. The HOCl in water containing 300 mg/L COD significantly declined (P ≤ 0.05) by the end of each 120-s trial, most likely due to the increased demand for the oxidant. Higher inoculum levels and lower HOCl concentrations were significant factors (P ≤ 0.05) that contributed to increased cross-contamination. At 25 mg/L HOCl, no Salmonella was recovered under all conditions from uninoculated tomatoes exposed to tomatoes inoculated at 104 CFU per tomato. When the inoculum was increased to 106 and 108 CFU per tomato, cross-contamination was observed, independent of COD levels. The results from this study indicate that the currently required sanitizer concentration (e.g., 100 or 150 mg/L) for flume water may be higher than necessary and warrants reevaluation.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference15 articles.
1. Bertoldi,
B.,
Bardsley
C. A.,
Baker
C. A.,
Pabst
C. R.,
Gutierrez
A.,
De
J.,
Luo
Y.,
and
SchneiderK. R.
2021.
Determining bacterial load and water quality parameters of tomato chlorinated tomato flume tanks in Florida packinghouses.
J. Food Prot.
84:
1784–
1792.
2. Bolten,
S.,
Gu
G.,
Luo
Y.,
Van Haute
S.,
Zhou
B.,
Millner
P.,
Micallef
S. A.,
and
NouX.
2020.
Salmonella inactivation and cross-contamination on cherry and grape tomatoes under simulated wash conditions.
Food Microbiol.
87:
103359.
3. Bornhorst,
E. R.,
Luo
Y.,
Park
E.,
Vinyard
B. T.,
Nou
X.,
Zhou
B.,
Turner
E.,
and
MillnerP. D.
2018.
Immersion-free, single-pass, commercial fresh-cut produce washing system: an alternative to flume processing.
Postharvest Biol. Technol.
146:
124–
133.
4. Chen,
X.,
and
HungY.-C.
2017.
Effects of organic load, sanitizer pH and initial chlorine concentration of chlorine-based sanitizers on chlorine demand of fresh produce wash waters.
Food Control77:
96–
101.
5. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services.
2018.
Tomato best practices manual. A guide to tomato good agricultural practices (T-GAP) and tomato best management practices (T-BMP).Available at: http://fvreports.freshfromflorida.com/5G_TomBPM.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.