Affiliation:
1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Office of Public Health Science; Office of Policy and Program Development; Office of Planning, Analysis and Risk Management; 1400 Independence Avenue S.W., Washington, DC 20250, USA (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0309-8897 [R.W.])
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Beef slaughter establishments employ many interventions to help minimize the occurrence of pathogens in their products. This study explored the effectiveness of various common interventions on microbial load using the results of the Beef-Veal Carcass Baseline Survey conducted in 2014 to 2015. The Food Safety and Inspection Service analyzed swab samples taken from 1,135 carcasses at 139 establishments. These included paired samples from post–hide removal (before evisceration) and prechill (after evisceration). Samples were tested for pathogens (Salmonella and Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli) and indicators (E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, and aerobic count [AC]). The sample size for pathogen-positive samples was small, impeding the establishment of a direct correlation between interventions and pathogens. However, we observed associations between pathogen-positive rate and log AC, indicating similar intervention effectiveness of pathogens and indicators in this study. Generally, the use of interventions reduced indicator concentrations. Each intervention produced a range of effectiveness, suggesting that how interventions are applied may be as important as which interventions are applied. The range of effectiveness for single interventions was a 0.4- to 1.9-log AC reduction; for multihurdle interventions, it ranged from 1.6- to 2.9-log AC reduction. The results of this study may be used by slaughter establishments to help identify effective intervention options for pathogen reduction.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Allender,
H. D.,
Buchanan
S.,
Abdelmajid
N.,
Arnold
I.,
Tankson
J.,
and
CarterJ. M.
2019.
Procedure for microbiological baseline surveys conducted by US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Food Control111:
107083.
2. Arthur,
T. M.,
Bosilevac
J. M.,
Nou
X.,
Shackleford
S. D.,
Wheeler
T. L.,
Kent
M. P.,
Jaroni
D.,
Pauling
B.,
Allen
D. M.,
and
KoohmaraieM.
2004.
Escherichia coli O157 prevalence and enumeration of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, and Escherichia coli O157 at various steps in commercial beef processing plants.
J. Food Prot.
67:
658–
665.
3. Arthur,
T. M.,
Kalchayanand
N.,
Agga
G. E.,
Wheeler
T. L.,
and
KoohmaraieM.
2017.
Evaluation of bacteriophage application to cattle in lairage at beef processing plants to reduce Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence on hides and carcasses.
Foodborne Pathog. Dis.
14:
17–
22.
4. Barkate,
M. L.,
Acuff
G. R.,
Lucia
L. M.,
and
HaleD. S.
1993.
Hot water decontamination of beef carcasses for reduction of initial bacterial numbers.
Meat Sci.
35:
397–
401.
5. Bolton,
D. J.,
Doherty
A. M.,
and
SheridanJ. J.
2001.
Beef HACCP: intervention and non-intervention systems.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
66:
119–
129.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献