Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
2. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-0296 [G.S.]
3. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4168-5662 [M.W.])
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Listeria monocytogenes (LM) contamination of produce can often be traced back to the environment of packinghouses and fresh-cut facilities. Because there is limited information on the detection, prevalence, and distribution of this pathogen in produce operations, environmental “routine sampling” plans for LM and other Listeria spp. were developed and implemented in three packinghouses and five fresh-cut facilities in the United States. For routine sampling, a total of 2,014 sponge samples were collected over six to eight separate samplings per operation, performed over 1 year; vector and preproduction samples (n = 156) were also collected as needed to follow up on positive findings. In addition, a single “validation sampling” visit by an outside expert was used to evaluate the routine sampling. Among the 2,014 routine sponge samples collected, 35 and 30 were positive for LM and Listeria species other than LM (LS), respectively. LM prevalence varied from 0.8 to 5.8% for packinghouses and <0.4 to 1.6% for fresh-cut facilities. Among the 394 validation sponge samples, 23 and 13 were positive for LM and LS, respectively. Validation sampling found statistically significantly higher LM prevalence compared with routine sampling for three of eight operations. For all samples collected, up to eight isolates per sample were characterized by sequencing of sigB, which allowed for classification into sigB allelic types. Among the 97 samples with more than one Listeria isolate characterized, 28 had more than one sigB allelic type present, including 18 sponges that were positive for LM and another Listeria species and 13 sponges that were positive for more than one LM subtype. This indicates that collection of multiple isolates is necessary to capture Listeria diversity present in produce operations. Additionally, 17 of 77 sponges that were positive for LM were positive at only one enrichment time (i.e., 24 or 48 h), indicating that LM testing after two different enrichment times provides enhanced sensitivity.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Beno,
S. M.,
Stasiewicz
M. J.,
Andrus
A. D.,
Ralyea
R. D.,
Kent
D. J.,
Martin
N. H.,
Wiedmann
M.,
and
BoorK. J.
2016.
Development and validation of pathogen environmental monitoring programs for small cheese processing facilities.
J. Food Prot.
79:
2095–
2106.
2. Butts,
J.
2003.
Seek & destroy: identifying and controlling Listeria monocytogenes growth niches.
Food Saf. Mag. Available at: https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/aprilmay-2003/seek-destroy-identifying-and-controlling-listeria-monocytogenes-growth-niches/. Accessed 6 March 2020.
3. Carstens,
C. K.,
Salazar
J. K.,
and
DarkohC.
2019.
Multistate outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States associated with fresh produce from 2010 to 2017.
Front. Microbiol.
10:
1–
15.
4. Cornell University,
Food Safety Laboratory and Milk Quality Improvement Program. Control of Listeria in produce.
Available at: https://foodsafety.foodscience.cornell.edu/links/control-listeria-produce/. Accessed 6 March 2020.
5. Estrada,
E.,
Hamilton
A. M.,
Sullivan
G. B.,
Wiedmann
M.,
Critzer
F. J.,
and
StrawnL. K.
2020.
Prevalence, persistence and diversity of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria species in produce packinghouses in three U.S. States.
J. Food Prot.
83:
277–
286.