“What Questions Do You Have?”: Teaching Medical Students to Use an Open-Ended Phrase for Eliciting Patients' Questions

Author:

Coleman Cliff,Salcido-Torres Fernando,Cantone Rebecca E.

Abstract

Patients frequently do not understand health information received in clinical settings, yet rates of question-asking by patients are low, particularly for patients with lower health literacy skills. Experts recommend that health care professionals attempt to elicit patients' questions by using an open-ended phrase, such as “What questions do you have?” as opposed to a closed-ended phrase like, “Do you have any questions?” We compared question-eliciting techniques used during video-recorded observed structured clinical examinations among medical students who had completed a mostly didactic curriculum on health literacy and clear communication ( n = 46) to students who completed a newer longitudinal problem-based communication curriculum ( n = 32). Students were not aware that they were being observed for specific communication skills. Compared to controls, students in the intervention group were more likely to spontaneously attempt to elicit questions from a standardized patient (65.2% vs. 84.4%, p = .06), and were significantly more likely to use an open-ended phrase to do so (6.7% vs. 51.9%, p = .0002). The longitudinal communication skills curriculum was successful in creating long-term patient-centered question-eliciting habits. Further research is needed to determine whether eliciting questions with an open-ended technique result in patients asking more or different clarifying questions during the closing phase of clinical encounters. [ HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice . 2022;6(1):e12–e16.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Health literacy: Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association;Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs;Journal of the American Medical Association,1999

2. American Medical Association Foundation. (2007). Health literacy and patient safety: Help patients understand. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGtTZ_vxjyA

3. Revisiting patient communication training: An updated needs assessment and the AGENDA model

4. Brega A. G. Barnard J. Mabachi N. M. Weiss B. D. DeWalt D. A. Brach C. Cifuentes M. Albright K. & West D. R. (2013). AHRQ health literacy universal precautions toolkit (2nd ed.). https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/healthlittoolkit2_4.pdf

5. CDC TRAIN. (n. d). Using numbers and explaining risk. https://www.train.org/cdctrain/course/1066815/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3