Can patients contribute to safer care in meetings with healthcare professionals? A cross-sectional survey of patient perceptions and beliefs

Author:

Ericsson CarinORCID,Skagerström Janna,Schildmeijer Kristina,Årestedt Kristofer,Broström Anders,Pakpour Amir,Nilsen Per

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate patients’ perceptions of their meetings with healthcare professionals and the extent to which they believe they can influence patient safety in these meetings.DesignCross-sectional survey of patients using a study-specific questionnaire. Data were analysed using both parametric and non-parametric statistics.SettingThe study was conducted in primary and secondary care in three county councils in southeast Sweden by means of a survey questionnaire despatched in January 2017.ParticipantsSurvey data were collected from 1445 patients, 333 of whom were complainants (patients who had filed a complaint about being harmed in healthcare) and 1112 regular patients (patients recruited from healthcare units).Main outcome measuresPatients’ perceptions of meetings with physicians and nurses, beliefs concerning patients’ contributions to safer care and whether the patients had suffered harm in healthcare during the past 10 years.ResultsMost respondents reported that it was easy to ask physicians and nurses questions (84.9% and 86.6%) and to point out if something felt odd in their care (77.7% and 80.7%). In general, complainants agreed to a higher extent compared with regular patients that patients can contribute to safer care (mean 1.92 and 2.13, p<0.001). Almost one-third (31.2%) of the respondents (both complainants and regular patients) reported that they had suffered harm in healthcare during the past 10 years.ConclusionsMost respondents believed that healthcare professionals can facilitate patient interaction and increase patient safety by encouraging patients to ask questions and take an active part in their care. Further research will need to identify strategies to support such questioning in routine practice and ensure that it achieves its intended goals.

Funder

The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, FORTE,

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference54 articles.

1. Patient safety: what about the patient?

2. Patient Participation: Current Knowledge and Applicability to Patient Safety

3. Coulter A , Ellins J . Patient-focused interventions: a review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation, 2006.

4. Patients and families as safety experts

5. World Health Organization . Patients for Patient Safety. Partnerships for Safer Health Care. Geneva: WHO, 2013.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3