Care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level in hospital: a qualitative systematic review protocol

Author:

Perfetto Kayley1ORCID,Pozzobon Laura1ORCID,Sears Kim12ORCID,O’Hara Jane3ORCID,Ross-White Amanda24ORCID,Duhn Lenora1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Health Quality Programs, School of Nursing, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

2. Queen’s Collaboration for Health Care Quality, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

3. THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England

4. Bracken Health Science Library, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to understand the experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety at the direct care level from the perspective of care partners, patients, and health care professionals. Introduction: Care partner engagement is a strategy for promoting patient safety in hospitals at the direct care level (ie, at the point where patient care is delivered). When present, care partners can increase safety by watching, listening, and taking action to protect admitted patients. To improve care partner presence policies and safety engagement strategies within hospitals, a comprehensive understanding of the current qualitative evidence about the breadth of experiences of care partner engagement in patient safety is required. Inclusion criteria: This review will include qualitative studies that consider the experiences of care partners, adult patients, and health care professionals. The engagement of care partners in patient safety within pediatric hospital settings will not be considered. Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. A preliminary literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and a full search strategy was developed for MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO (all via Ovid), as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis. The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, data synthesis, and assessment of confidence will be followed. Two reviewers will test the screening criteria and data extraction protocol. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42023476286

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference23 articles.

1. The impact of hospital harm on length of stay, costs of care and length of person-centred episodes of care: a retrospective cohort study;Tessier;CMAJ,2019

2. Health care provider factors associated with patient-reported adverse events and harm;Giardina;Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2020

3. Patients’ perspectives of engagement as a safety strategy;Burrows-Walters;Oncol Nurs Forum,2017

4. The feelings and experiences of hospitalized patients regarding informal caregivers: a qualitative study;Uysal;Soc Work Health Care,2019

5. A 5-facet framework to describe patient engagement in patient safety;Duhn;Health Expect,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3